Monday, August 31, 2009

"That's what racism is" (updated with video)*

This is the most sickening swill I have heard since...well, the last sickening swill that assaulted my good senses only an hour before this(which, in the 'kwa, is a regular occurrence as jewthink swill permeates much of our public discourse)

I don't have much respect in general for anyone who would write in to one of these crypto jew "advice columnist" know it alls in the first place, but, at least on a primal level, this woman knows that miscegenation is wrong, even as she must reflexively offer up the disclaimer of "I'm not a racist, but..."

White women, and especially young girls, are under enormous pressure to conform to the directive that they open their legs for any non-White savage who approaches them lest they be deemed "racist." Here, in this column, the guilt is laid on pretty thick in my opinion. Men and women of all races pass over each other for a whole host of superficial reasons, but the one that is perhaps the most important of all, the continuation of your unique European heritage and identity with a compatible partner, is scoffed at as something less than noble. "What, you want to be with your own kind and produce children that look like you while at the same time having a stable life and a sustainable future?! You rayciss!!!"

It is not enough for the multi-kult sadists like this "columnist" to have this woman adopt a "live and let live, to each his own" view of the whole mess. No, she must surrender fully to the race mixing agenda and partake of it herself. Anything less is "racist."















Dear Carolyn: Some friends of mine had been talking up this guy they thought would be perfect for me, so I finally went on a blind date with him. It turns out he's black, and while I am not racist and have no problem with interracial dating in general, it's not for me. I just prefer to date white guys.

I told my friends why I wouldn't be seeing him again, and they were, shockingly, horrified. Did I miss something here? I know interracial dating is more prevalent now than it used to be, but I didn't realize it was so common that you get in trouble if you don't want to do it. I figured if I'm the one who needs a kick in the pants, you're the perfect person to give it to me, but I'm hoping you'll tell me I'm right, that no one should have to date anyone they don't want to.

SACRAMENTO

Carolyn says: You're right -- no one should have to date anyone s/he doesn't want to.

And your friends are right, too -- they shouldn't have to pretend they're not horrified by something they find morally repugnant.

And you're right, interracial dating is more prevalent now, but its prevalence here is the cart; the issue here is the horse.

More people date interracially because more people realize that the only alternative to being racist is to judge each person as a person.(We iz all eekwals afta all!)

Your decision not to date this man wasn't about his character or lack thereof, it wasn't about his sex appeal or lack thereof, it wasn't about his intellect or lack thereof, it wasn't about his sense of humor or lack thereof, it wasn't about his work ethic or lack thereof, it wasn't about shared history or lack thereof, it wasn't about his goals or lack thereof, it wasn't about his compatibility or lack thereof. (I disagree. Her decision was based on these things because she didn't want to learn the hard way that he "lacked thereof" on so many statistically proven fronts.)

To your credit, you're owning your opinion; all you had to say was that you didn't find him attractive, and this conversation doesn't happen.

(Except the dimwit "friends" continue to think that she's a mudshark like the rest of them and keeps on sending her these shitskins until she gets the one who ends up pouring Drano down her throat and puts her dismembered body into Hefty Cinch Sacks a.k.a. "a nigger's first date").

However: We're having this conversation because you didn't find his race attractive. That's what racism is. (Ahem. "People shouldn't have to pretend they're not horrified by something they find morally repugnant")


*Detroiter posted this video today(9/1/09) over at DIC, and I'm adding it to this story due to its timely nature and relevance to the topic at hand. Like a lot of the posters over there, I believe this woman is White, a naive fool who, for whatever reason, wanted to taste the forbidden fruit and the "joys of diversity". This is what our friend "Sacramento" said "no" to, thereby saving herself a lot of heartbreak, misery and grief. It could have ended worse...

Thursday, August 27, 2009

Yet Another Way to Malign and Slander White People:"Environmental Racism"

The Marxist coward who has posted this video dutifully deletes any comments that are left in opposition to what is (erroneously) posited in this piss poor production. I have commented on the user's page(pending approval, of course!)asking that the offensive material be removed. I have further flagged the video with the jewtubers. I wont be holding my breath given the fact that only "protected groups" are extended the courtesies that we are routinely denied as per article 5 of their preposterous "guidelines":

"Promotes hatred or violence against a protected group
Hate speech is content that promotes or encourages hatred or violence towards a group based on race or ethnic origin, religion, disability, gender, age, veteran status and sexual orientation/gender identity.


Monday, August 24, 2009

Oy Vey! Smuggling kikejew: "I vaz holocausted in Brazil"

Jewel Smuggling kikejew has beanie slapped off head, beard cut by Brazilian customs authorities

This article is so poorly written by whatever kike wrote it that I'm just going to give it the all out Reichsmarshal treatment(some of it is so authentic in terms of broken English it will be difficult to tell what is my doing and which is the actual article).

http://www.vosizneias.com/37185/2009/08/24/sao-paulo-outrage-as-charedi-jew-humiliated-cut-off-beard-peyos-by-brazilian-authorities/















Da vorld's smallest violin. Only a jew has da humanity to truly understand suffer-ink


Sao Paulo - An "Orthodox" kikejew aged 56, vas arrested on land-ink in Guarulhos International Airport vith jewels, diamonds and vatches undeclared denounces have-ink suffered humiliation in jail in Sao Paulo. Electrical Engineer, with American passport, he left for Germany on July 6 and said he vould visit friends in Sao Paulo. He vas arrested vhen he passed da landing.

Now he claims to be traumatized. Dis is not da vey.

"I vas very ill, vondering what da Germans did to za joos 60 years ago. And that is vhat they did to me now in Brazil" he said. "I vas holocausted all over again!"

The engineer spent three days detained at the Federal Police, in Guarulhos Airport and den vas transferred to a Provisional Detention Center (PDC) .Dis vas similar to fate of joos in Poland who vas transported from vun death camp to another, never knowing ven dis time dey vood be sent to oven. He says that in the town, after passing a screening, he vas the victim of religious intolerance. Dis vas like still fresh vounds from hollowcost having salt thrown on dem.

He says dat a jailer threw on the floor his yarmulke a small hat mandatory for all orthodox jew."He den began talk-ink vith a colleague who vas on da side, laugh-ink at me. Then they said 'Heil Hitler'. To me. A jew. Can you imagine? After survive-ink da hollacost? Every-vun should go to theater now to see 'Inglorious Basterds' to remember hollowco$t"

The engineer says that, after insulting him, the guards found in his luggage two religious objects, the tallit and tefillin, and threw on da floor of the accessories that are considered sacred.

But da vorst was yet to come.

The jailer asked me how long I had a beard. I said that since it had started to grow. He replied, then, that from dat day, I vill not have no beard.

The engineer says dey put him in a chair, handcuffed hands and feet. Den, his beard vas shaved completely. All da way off. Noth-ink left. To a jew dey did dis. Whoever saves von jewish life saves all life eternal. Ya. Dats vhat Shpiel-burg said in 'Schindler's List.'

- It is on our Torah, vhich is our bible,vhen ve are not reading sacred talmud, which is banned you destroy part of his beard. According to Kabbalah, the mystical part of judaism through the beard, we receive divine blessings explains the rabbi. And ven ve circumsize da young boyss, ve suck da blood from da penis. Some of dis blood gets stuck in beard, vich ve can den enjoy later on.

They also cut off the curls [Pies] he kept since birth, and symbolizing devotion to G_d.

In some camps, the humiliation they did with the Orthodox Jews vas to cut his beard and mock dem. I see this as an anti-Semitic act, an isolated act but an act of disrespect and humiliation to him says da rabbi.

I feel a great shame. I sit in my house without leav-ink for a year until my beard grow says the engineer. And I sit, and I vonder, who can I sue? How can ve profit from dis misfortune? My shame? No, not dat I vas smuggler and thief, but dat I vas anti-semited.

According to da Secretariat of Penitentiary Administration, da prisoners are treated in a standardized manner and have the beard and hair cut, just as da nat-zees did to joos. With respect to American, the Secretariat also explained that his beard vas very long, at the navel, like da ZZ Top, ya.

In a statement, the Secretariat reported that there vas no physical aggression, moral or psychological, but that will investigate the case properly, because da vord of a jew iss more important than even da truth.

It is a standard procedure, but that it contains exceptions. These agents have practiced some crimes, such as abuse of authority and certainly the crime of racism, and practice to encourage prejudice against religion, belief and ethnicity said the lawyer representing the engineer, Augusto de Arruda Botelho.

This is the same opinion of Judge Sergio Mazina Martins, human rights expert and president of the Brazilian Institute of Criminal Sciences (IBCCrim).

You vant to prevent the individual to have a certain beard, a certain hair, when in fact it makes him part of their culture and their own religious beliefs points.

Now released, the engineer uses fake beard. He hopes the court will decide whether to wait for the progress of the process in Germany, where he says live.

I want to go home. I hope they do not do this anymore to jews who want to keep his beard - he says. It iss like hollowso$t all over again. Ve must never forget.

*******

Now for the best part: the comments. Though some have been excised for our purposes, none were tampered with. Kikes really are some piece of work. Here, they prove they are as loathsome as we say they are.


"We simply have had too many cases wherein people who dress as orthodox Jews commit crimes"

"we are all jews commenting on this website, why do we only have to talk about the negative side?this person was a victim of anti semitism"


"acc. to the gemoro 3 simanim etc. you are not mizera yisroel; you WANT a fellow jew to serve time in prison.. such ahavas yisroel.."

"dont steal. when you do. PLEASE, take off you kippa!!"


"yes he might of done a crime, but they did evil and shame on them. NATZI, shaim rishu'im yirkuv. nebach. from all the news i read here is that we are hedding alittle backwards in the world as a hole, we are hedding back to being the dogs of the world. nebach" (Shlomo knows the end game has already begun and time is running out.)


"Don’t you think it is a bit extreme to “reserve judgment” on such a blatant expression of anti-Semitism? "

"The issue is the anti-Semitism which is the norm in this world, and goes virtually unchecked."

"There are two issues; one is smuggling (which is NOT the issue here) and the other is the treatment of a Jew in a foreign prison."

...and dats da vey it goes...and goes...and goes...


Thursday, August 20, 2009

Stepping in Mexcriment

I don't like to grab things off of Western Voices World News or other pro-White news sites and repost, because you can obviously go there and read or look at these things yourself. This video, however, is the sort of thing that makes my blood boil, and needs to be spread far and wide.

Niggers, as dangerous and problematic as they are, amount to little more than unorganized buffoons when compared to the emerging threat posed by these turd worlders who are descending on us like a plague of subhuman locusts.

Bad things are in the winds and on the way.

Towards a Militarized Police State

The Pentagon Wants Authority to Post Almost 400,000 Agents of ZOG in U.S.

The Pentagon has approached Congress to grant the Secretary of Defense the authority to post almost 400,000 military personnel throughout the United States in times of emergency or a major disaster.

This request has already occasioned a dispute with the nation’s governors. And it raises the prospect of U.S. military personnel patrolling the streets of the United States, in conflict with the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878.

In June, the U.S. Northern Command distributed a “Congressional Fact Sheet” entitled “Legislative Proposal for Activation of Federal Reserve Forces for Disasters.” That proposal would amend current law, thereby “authorizing the Secretary of Defense to order any unit or member of the Army Reserve, Air Force Reserve, Navy Reserve, and the Marine Corps Reserve, to active duty for a major disaster or emergency.”

Taken together, these reserve units would amount to “more than 379,000 military personnel in thousands of communities across the United States,” explained

Paul Stockton, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense and America’s Security Affairs, in a letter to the National Governors Association, dated July 20.

The governors were not happy about this proposal, since they want to maintain control of their own National Guard forces, as well as military personnel acting in a domestic capacity in their states.

“We are concerned that the legislative proposal you discuss in your letter would invite confusion on critical command and control issues,” Governor James H. Douglas of Vermont and Governor Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, the president and vice president of the governors’ association, wrote in a letter back to Stockton on August 7. The governors asserted that they “must have tactical control over all . . . active duty and reserve military forces engaged in domestic operations within the governor’s state or territory.”

According to Pentagon public affairs officer Lt. Col. Almarah K. Belk, Stockton has not responded formally to the governors but understands their concerns.

“There is a rub there,” she said. “If the Secretary calls up the reserve personnel to provide support in a state and retains command and control of those forces, the governors are concerned about if I have command and control of the Guard, how do we ensure unity of effort and everyone is communicating and not running over each other.”

Belk said Stockton is addressing this problem. “That is exactly what Dr. Stockton is working out right now with the governors and DHS and the National Guard,” she said. “He’s bringing all the stakeholders together.”

Belk said the legislative change is necessary in the aftermath of a “catastrophic natural disaster, not beyond that,” and she referred to Katrina, among other events.

But NorthCom’s Congressional fact sheet refers not just to a “major disaster” but also to “emergencies.” And it says, “Those terms are defined in section 5122 of title 42, U.S. Code.”

That section gives the President the sole discretion to designate an event as an “emergency” or a “major disaster.” Both are “in the determination of the President” alone.

That section also defines “major disaster” by citing plenty of specifics: “hurricane, tornado, storm, high water, wind-driven water, tidal wave, tsunami, earthquake, volcanic eruption, landslide, mudslide, snowstorm, or drought,” as well as “fire, flood, or explosion.”

But the definition of “emergency” is vague: “Emergency means any occasion or instance for which, in the determination of the President, Federal assistance is needed to supplement State and local efforts and capabilities to save lives and to protect property and public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in any part of the United States.”

Currently, the President can call up the Reserves only in an emergency involving “a use or threatened use of a weapon of mass destruction” or “a terrorist attack or threatened terrorist attack in the United States that results, or could result, in significant loss of life or property,” according to Title 10, Chapter 1209, Section 12304, of the U.S. Code. In fact, Section 12304 explicitly prohibits the President from calling up the Reserves for any other “natural or manmade disaster, accident, or catastrophe.”

So the new proposed legislation would greatly expand the President’s power to call up the Reserves in a disaster or an emergency and would extend that power to the Secretary of Defense. (There are other circumstances, such as repelling invasions or rebellions or enforcing federal authority, where the President already has the authority to call up the Reserves.)

The ACLU is alarmed by the proposed legislation. Mike German, the ACLU’s national security policy counsel, expressed amazement “that the military would propose such a broad set of authorities and potentially undermine a 100-year-old prohibition against the military in domestic law enforcement with no public debate and seemingly little understanding of the threat to democracy.”

At the moment, says Pentagon spokesperson Belk, the legislation does not have a sponsor in the House or the Senate.

You can bet they wont be coming here to roust the taco benders and beat them back to old me-hee-co.

Would "American" soldiers fire on their own people? Magic Eight Ball says "it is likely."

U.S. Troops Asked If They Would Shoot American Citizens
Published on 2008-02-04 00:00:00

Source: Propaganda Matrix - Paul Joseph Watson

U.S. troops are being trained to conduct round-ups, confiscate guns and shoot American citizens, including their own friends and family members, as part of a long-standing program to prepare for the declaration of martial law, according to a soldier who recently returned from Iraq.

We received an e mail from "Scott", a member of a pipefitters union that runs an apprenticeship program called Helmets To Hard Hats, which according to its website, "Is a national program that connects National Guard, Reserve and transitioning active-duty military members with quality career training and employment opportunities within the construction industry."

Scott writes that his company hired a soldier who had recently returned from Iraq, who told him that U.S. troops were being quizzed on whether or not they would be prepared to shoot their own friends and family members during a national state of emergency in America.
"I have become very close to this young man and have gained his respect and trust," writes Scott. "I want you to know that he informed me about one particular training exercise his superiors made them perform. It was concerning the rounding up of American citizens that disobey any type of martial law or in other words any type of infringement on our freedoms."

"He was asked if he could shoot his friends or family members if ordered to do so. At the time he said he could," writes Scott.

Scott says that the soldier later "had time to clear his head" and realize the truth, recanting his vow to kill his own countrymen if ordered to do so.
The issue of whether U.S. troops would be prepared to round-up, disarm and if necessary shoot Americans who disobeyed orders during a state of martial law is a question that military chiefs have been attempting to answer for at least 15 years.

Its known origins can be traced back to an October 1994 Marine questionnaire out of the Twentynine Palms Marine Base in California. Recruits were asked 46 questions, including whether they would kill U.S. citizens who refused to surrender their firearms.

Documentary film maker Alex Jones* brought to light similar training programs that were taking place across the country in the late 90's which revolved around U.S. Marines being trained to arrest American citizens and take them to internment camps.

During one such program in Oakland California, dubbed "Operation Urban Warrior," Marines refused to answer if they would target American citizens for gun confiscation if ordered to do so.

During hurricane Katrina, National Guard units were ordered to confiscate guns belonging to New Orleans residents.

As we first exposed in May 2006, Clergy Response Teams are being trained by the federal government and FEMA to "quell dissent" and pacify citizens to obey the government in the event of a declaration of martial law.

Pastors and other religious representatives are being taught to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for the implementation of martial law, property and firearm seizures, mass vaccination programs and forced relocation.

Many scoffed at our original story, which was based on the testimony of a whistleblower who was asked to participate in the program. Claims that the story was a conspiracy theory soon evaporated when a mainstream KSLA news report confirmed the existence of the program.
The experiences of U.S. troops in the worst areas of Iraq, where soldiers are ordered to go door to door and arrest all men of military age as well as confiscate their weapons, is a mere portend of what is being planned for America if these training programs ever come to fruition.

http://www.blacklistednews.com/view.asp?ID=5482

*I DO NOT endorse the conspiracy kook Alex Jones. He lost me the day he said that "Arabs ran Hollywood", and subsequent refusals to name the jew, and instead proffers some kind of fantasy about "illuminati" and "skull and bones" secret societies. In that, he is indistinguishable from the fruit cakes who think that lizard men are behind the jew world order. He is, in my opinion, merely controlled opposition, setting fires and leading his listeners off chasing the smoke while missing the inferno blazing before their very eyes.


Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Sliding Towards South Africa

From one White man to another, I empathize with the kid in this video. However, I find his naivete appalling. Someone living in the sort of stark reality that is SA really should know better.

The fundamental flaw in his thinking is his belief that niggers would and should be "grateful" that apartheid has been abolished since they have been given not only a place at the table, but sit at the head of it, with the Whites who built the country now relegated to begging dog status waiting for the scraps to hit the floor. He expects them to treat White South Africans according to the same uniquely White characteristics of civility and fair play. In effect, he fails to realize that it is not just the melanin levels that differentiate us from these brutish beasts, but that even allowing them into a civilized society is akin to walking through a lion exhibit with a pork chop dangling from your mouth. The outcome of either scenario is tragically predictable. There were reasons for apartheid. There were reasons for Jim Crow. In the 1950's there was no nigger crime problem in the south(as chronicled in the Time magazine article that has resurfaced in recent years on sites like AmRen). Niggers behaving badly was the exclusive provenance of the big industrialized cities of the north such as Chicago, New York, Detroit, etc.

The speaker in this video is living in a multicultural delusion, thinking that he should be singing "kumbaya" with his black "brethren", rather than fend off dispossession and genocide. He speaks often of "democracy" not knowing that it is the well spring of poison from which all civilizations eventually die. He speaks of Jacob Zuma and John Mugabe as being "corrupt" yet denying that the racial differences which define their characteristics have nothing to do with why he opposes them, a similar disclaimer I hear from White Americans who oppose obongo on "strictly ideological" grounds.

We are sliding towards South Africa. The difference is that they dismantled their entire society virtually over night. We are merely handing ours over piece meal, over the course of the past 40 years, culminating in the debacle we now find ourselves in(and this is but the beginning of the end). The more ground that is ceded, the more that is taken. When we have next to nothing left, they will take that too. At least due to the toxic shock of such a vast change, they know they have a problem. We are virtually being lulled to sleep as the theives rob us blind and dispossess us of our rightful place in the country built by and for us. The slow death by a thousand cuts has so weakened and debilitated us that our very survival is imperiled.

Welcome to the cult of nigger victimhood, my South African friend. Discover what we here in Amerikwa have been dealing with for multiple decades, as past grievances are systematically thrown in our faces in order to expropriate and extort. It wont end. Not in South Africa, and not here. Not until the cancer is removed and the body can get on with the healing that comes from self determination.

What is to come? It's largely in our hands(and the dilemma is it's also largely out of our hands, given the magnitude of what we face). There is no cavalry coming over the mountain, no charismatic Fuhrer on the rise to lead us out of the darkness. Just you and me. And the will to survive.



When will it be enough?






A little hard to read, but this is an ad for CIA recruitment appealing to "da hip hop generation". In the years to come, as we mirror South Africa more and more,this is the sort of disheveled shitskin agent of ZOG who will be on your porch flashing a badge, leering suggestively at your wives and daughters as his fellow ZOG lackeys ransack your personal belongings.

As disheartening as such a scenario is and should be, keep in mind what my friend Hammer of Thorr had to say when I showed him this photo: "The more Blacks and others infest the alphabet agencies, the less effective those agencies will be against Whites. AA hirelings BELONG in government. They help push the boulder off the cliff."

Sunday, August 2, 2009

"It's a trick, we always use it..."

"Anti-semitism" is a knee jerk canard leveled against ANY criticism of Iss-rael and G_d's Self Chosen. As this video reveals, it is used by kikejews to obtain their political, social and economic goals by bludgeoning dissenters and critics, and labelling them with a term that I believe is beginning to lose it's validity and ability to damage through over use and abuse. Similarly, the holohoax is a political weapon to be wielded in order to achieve jewish aims, by inducing "goy" guilt and "shaming" the governments of Europe and the U.S. to bend to its will.

Funny, isn't it, how Churchill's multi-volume memoirs on WW2 didn't mention "gas chambers" a single time? Nor did Ike the kike's remembrances ever once broach the subject (even though we are told what an impact Dachau had on him, and Patton allegedly vomitted upon seeing the "atrocities" which, were in fact merely war dead stacked due to interrupted supply lines bringing in necessities like, say food. And why would a blood and guts, war hardened general like Patton become weak in the knees in the first place? Oh yeah, they were jews which made it so tragic and sickening, err...wait, there were no jews interned on German soil...you see how quickly this farce falls apart when you're even in partial possession of the facts).

The fact is, that "holocaust" was not even a term related to the "jewish experience" in WW2 until the 1970's with jewified rewriting of history and the tv miniseries entitled, ironically enough "Holocaust." Follow the trail of this curious thing called "da holla cost" here: http://judicial-inc.biz/frank_collins.htm