McCain and Graham's Proposed Police State

I wonder how much more 'kwans are going to take, now that we're reaching the point where their very existence has almost been criminalized. Where do "tea party" retards stand on this? "Hurrah! Can't let the terrorists win. This is amurika! Can't wait 'til we nuke those Iranian bastards! They want to wipe Iz-rell off the map!!!" That might be an unfair assessment to blanket that entire "movement" with, but I'm willing to bet it's the attitude of at least 7 out of 10, especially since the tea party has morphed back into the republicunt party. Hey, vote for Newt Gingrich. He'll fix everything.

I never liked either of them, but let me just say that John McCain and the creepy faggot Lindsey Graham are a pair of the lowest pieces of steaming excrement anyone has ever scraped off of the bottom of their shoe. They should be dead ten times over for the laundry list of treasonous acts they've inflicted on the United States. But instead, "conservatives" keep electing them. Over and over.

The message of this legislation is clear. If you dare think you're going to live off the ZOG grid, even for a meager 7 days, you will be thrown into a gulag and all evidence of your existence will be wiped away. Who decides who is an "enemy combatant"? No court of law or court of public opinion. The Secretary of Defense and the Attorney General will decide who is deemed a "domestic terrorist"(what an Orwellian title, which aptly describes the ZOG itself).

I hope one day we're not all looking through the wrong side of a razor wire fence saying "y'know, maybe we should have done something..."

Politics As Usual

It appears that it is now official. Israel's favorite boot licking, bought and paid for shabbas goy toady is going to make a run for the Whore House. All you really need to know about this lunatic is contained in the brief video above. New readers can refer to the piece I did on mizz Bachmann last year.

Is Bachmann a crypto-jew? Who goes to a "kibbutz" unless they are a chosenite?



In 2008, Bachmann appeared on the drooling faggot Chris Matthews' show "Hardball" calling for a "media investigation" of all the "anti-American" politicians in the Congress. This traitorous harpy should have first looked in her own mirror. Pledging one's allegiance to a foreign, alien power is an act of treason. In fact, it's about the most subversive, treacherous act of national betrayal one could possibly engage in.

Not that I expected it to be any different, but this years crop of Republicunt contenders amounts to a clownish collection of empty suited cyphers, perennial candidates, and rotting left over retreads from the last election. If none of those are to your liking there is always the boot lipped nigger Herman Cain. An endorsement of Herman will assuage that White Guilt and protect you(not really) from the "racist" tag, as is the primary concern of Tea Party retards. And don't worry about the color thing. AIPAC left a big pile of money on Whoring Herman's night stand, so you know he's "right" on Israel!

Ron Paul? Are you people still falling for that old line of bullshit? If anyone in pro-White circles is still placing their hopes in this goofy charlatan, then they are fucking stupid. Lone Wolf of Thy Weapon of War has a must read analysis of the Paul Delusion that should rub the sleep from the eyes of those not yet awake to reality.

The sad thing is, once you see the whole system for what it truly is, you become jaded. There is no refuge in the Blight Wing, even on an entertainment level. I have read most of Ann Coulter's books and even really liked a couple of them. She put a new one out a few weeks ago and I was thinking about buying it. The first barrier to me actually putting my money down was the premise of the book stated in the subtitle "Demonic: How The Liberal Mob Is Endangering America."

Sorry, but when I think of "mobs" that are "endangering America" I tend to envision scenes like what's been going on in Chicago, Illinois for the past two months, with shitskin savages running amok, targeting White victims. Not feminized birkenstock wearing hippies swinging their purses at a rally for fag "marriage."

The second thing that turned me off was the requisite press tour. Goofy Ann, flipping her locks around like a dimbo-bimbo, jabbering back and forth with the T.V. talking heads like she's on dope. Then she's going on about Thurgood Marshall. Not to bash him, but in proclaiming him as some kind of new found hero! She praised him for his legal skills in arguing Brown vs. Board of Education. You know, the landmark decision that opened the gates of hell, exposing subsequent generations of White children to rape, assault, robbery, intimidation and general TNB. Yeah, Ann thinks that was great.

She also thinks Michael(a.k.a. Martin Loofer) King is great too. Because he "peacefully" stood up to the "vicious racist"(her words) Bull Connor who was a ~gasp~ democrat! (I guess Ann doesn't know about the mudsharks and jewesses who were fornicating with nigger bucks on people's lawns, and savages defecating in public which enraged the communities we see in those old news reels).

Eventually I did make it to a book store and leafed through the thing to see what the general tone was. I read with interest a passage on the Ku Klux Klan. They belonged to the democrat party and terrorized "african-americans" and, yes, I'm not making this up, they also tormented "republicans." Generally, it was just a trite tome, beating the dead horse of partisan politics, which never gets any deeper than "republicans good, democrats bad". The jew was not named, nor were any racial truths revealed(surprise!). I set the book back on the shelf and walked away, concluding that the only thing "demonic" about this waste of precious timber were the lies and distortions put to paper by this hideous crone who does herself no favors by draping her cadaverous body with a slinky black dress in order to sell books to sexually repressed conservatards. The grapefruit sized adam's apple, the sunken cheeks, hallowed out eye sockets, man hands, knobby knees and bones protruding through her skin don't really do much for me.

But being jaded by the waste land of politics and media isn't such a bad thing. You can at least say with some confidence "wont get fooled again."

It helps if you've got a pair of these:

"Hoe-leeeee shit. There's a lot more jews walkin' around than I thought!"

The new republican boss. Same as the old democrat boss

More Piddling Cum Puddles From A Masturbating Pseudo-Intellectual

A true leader of (girly) men

For someone who touts themselves as being an intellectual, "Hunter Wallace"(a.k.a Cunter Wallace, Fade the Butcher, Fag the Bitcher) never ceases to churn out mediocre writing that expresses (in tedious, dry, masturbatory essay form) the inane thoughts of someone with far too much time on their hands.

One of his latest offerings from the Occidental Dipshit is an essay that declares Glenn Beck as something of a White Nationalist Messiah. Beck held a rally in Washington D.C. over the weekend that was part evangelical love-in and part multi-culti utopian bullshit festival celebrating the "legacy" of "Dr. Martin Luther King" (real name Mike King). One wonders what there is to celebrate about a plagiarist, communist and woman beater who declared on the night before he was assassinated "I'm not a negro tonight!" before savagely beating a White prostitute in his motel room.

In addition to Mike King's niece(giving Beck the much need "street cred" to prove he's not "racist") there was a gaggle of kikenweasel rabbies, islamo-nutbag "mullahs" and other clergymen of dubious theology all on stage. Almost all of the "heroes" who spoke were niggers, from what I saw on Beck's program this afternoon.

The bimbosaurus Sarah Palin was also in attendance. Cunter also proclaims her as the spearhead of "implicit Whiteness." Really? Is this the way a WN talks?



Cunter pumps his palm to drop this load all over himself: "Glenn Beck has done us a service here. Undoubtedly, “Restoring Honor” will be attacked in some circles for its kosher rhetorical concessions to political correctness. This is missing the forest for the trees."


The goal posts have been moved in several critical ways:(insert eye rolling emoticon here)

1.) White Americans are starting to think of themselves as “outsiders” ruled by “insiders” – the arrogant liberal elite that Barack Obama symbolizes. This is a major prerequisite of group identity, consciousness, and rebellion. * See below why this is an absolute falsehood

2.) Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin have succeeded in politicizing millions of White Americans who were formerly apolitical. Sheer apathy has always been one of the biggest obstacles to the formation of White racial consciousness. (Huh? "Politicized" to what end? Voting republicunt in order to finish off the White dispossession started by democrats? More Whites killed in endless desert wars implementing the foreign policy of Israel Uber Alles?)

Joe Six Pack has progressed from tuning out politics altogether to growing concerned about the direction of the country. Simply getting him to put down the beer and cheez-whiz, turn off the football game, and get off the La-Z-Boy for a moment to think about the future is in itself a huge accomplishment. (Off the couch to go to a multi-kult rally to have White Guilt reinforced and the "diversity" message hammered home yet again. It will be nappy time once again for the herd once the next republicunt takes office, and they can return to their lives of relative comfort, smaller government(with an ever expanding military-industrial complex) and a life of baubles and empty amusements. So much for taking a moment to "think about the future.")

3.) White Americans are starting to believe that America has been hijacked and perverted by an alien elite. This isn’t the whole truth, but it is a tantalizing enough clue to point curious people in the right direction.(See above commentary. That curiosity will have evaporated by the time the new republicunt is sworn in. Business as Usual. Meet the New Boss and everything old is new again.)

4.) White Americans have been told they are justified in “taking our country back.” This is a nationalist claim. If it is our country, we are entitled to it. The rightful heirs can take it back from the interlopers. (this is every bit as much empty rhetoric as Cunter bashes other WNs for.)

Glenn Beck’s Implicit White Nationalism (lol. No. Really. I'm laughing out loud.)

Fifty years of brainwashing isn’t going to be cast off in a day. If we have any hope of influencing our peers, we must have a realistic attitude and take as our starting point where ordinary White Americans find themselves on the political spectrum.(Who's going to do that? An effeminate little blogger? The only thing that's going to cut through the decades of jewthink inculcation is a fucking brick to the face by a savage nigger rioter.)

Judging by the “Restoring Honor” turnout, Glenn Beck seems to be striking the right chord in that respect. He can now speak with authority for the White majority. Unlike the rhetorical radicals, he has tailored his message to get their attention. (Does this fucking clown even watch Beck's show? He's a confounded goofball who changes positions and thought patterns on a dime from show to show, is given to womanly balling, despises his own German heritage because of what the "Nazis did" and has said so numerous times and constantly runs these fraudulent segments every week called "Black Founding Fathers".[sic]

He's a self proclaimed "historian" except he's just in the past year started reading it, and he shares what he's learned (often wrong and/or incomplete) on the day he learns it which makes for a bunch of disjointed conspiratorial mumbo jumbo that conveniently leaves out jewish malfeasance in every instance. More importantly, the entire enterprise is a self aggrandizing money making machine used to sell books, garner ratings and have rallies like the one Cunter is so in awe of.)

Beck is now in a position to lead the White majority from George W. Bush-style “compassionate conservatism” to Sarah Palin-style “implicit White Nationalism”; from apathy to engagement; from flag waving nationalist insider status to Don’t Tread on Me outsider status; from reform to revolution. (This passage is actually embarrassing. Cunter's cum rag is saturated beyond all recognition with this spew.)

Should he choose to do so.(and why would he throw away his media empire for something as non-lucrative as White survival?)

If you are looking for a more realistic assessment and analysis of what this rally really portends then I recommend this post from James Edwards of the Political Cesspool. Much more in tune with reality and without the pseudo-intellectual dross:

http://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/2010/08/30/glenn-beck-828-rally-the-death-rattle-of-mainstream-conservatism/


*Why "Fade's" first point is wrong and why his entire argument crumbles into dust:


Why Americans Don't REVOLT

50% of adults work for government at a local, county, state or federal level, or for a corporation that has a contract with the federal government. None will bite the hand that feeds them.

10% are unemployed and will not bite the hand that feeds them.

15% are on welfare and will never ever bite the hand that feeds them.

20% are getting or within a few years be getting social security and will not bite the hand that feeds them.

The best chance the unfunded 5% have is a worldwide economic collapse where the other 95% lose their System support.

http://drleonardcoldwell.com/2010/08/22/why-americans-will-never-revolt-against-government/


It should be obvious by the way that I constantly refer to Brad Griffin(his real name) using the same unflattering mockeries of his various handles used by his detractors that I dislike this pudgy, pud whacking pile of dog shit. That would be an understatement. From the first moment I heard this whiny little faggot on the Jim Giles radio show where he wailed like an old woman about some hypothetical jewish kids being killed versus the very real day to day rape, mutilation and murder of White men ,women and children, I detested him. Subsequent viewings of his blog Occidental Dissent have done much to reinforce my disdain. I learned that he's a bored rich kid who changes ideologies the way one cleans out their closet to make way for this year's newest fashions. He used to be a liberal and a malicious hacker. He attempts to ride the coat tails of Jared "I'm o.k. with the jews, how about you?" Taylor and actually boasts of having the neo-cohen kikejew David Frum linked to his blog, as if this were an honor.

I only keep abreast of what this buffoon and his other equally pretentious co-conspirators are up to by following the blog roll on Access St. Louis. Most of the Occidental Dipshit's headlines don't inspire me to click on and actually read these boredom inducing masturbatory musings. Were this particular post not so outrageously inane and fucking stupid, this little slug would not have merited a moment of my thought. But at least we can all rest easy in the knowledge that he's "out in the real world" saving the White race, one useless whigger at a time.

Kikejews Shut Down Incogman

As most of you know by now, Incogman's Wordpress blog has been flushed down the memory hole by the usual suspects, in this case some kikejew hasbarats who set up Incogman for his fall by posting comments advocating violence, from my understanding of the situation.

I like Incog and have a tremendous amount of respect for his writing as well as his unwavering commitment to exposing the jew for the subversive nation wrecking parasites that they truly are. Before I ever laid eyes on his blog, I lurked at Stormfront and he was one of the most notable posters that I have yet to come across there.

The thing I disliked most about Incog's blog(though not really his fault) and the very thing that ultimately led to it being put in the recycle bin, was the high number of shit disturbing hasbarats who hijacked threads and just generally stunk up the place with vile jewthink.

May he go on to a self hosted Wordpress theme and redouble his efforts against the forces of pure evil.

Incog speaks: "Yes, they did shut me down. Permanently.

Although I have no specific knowledge of why they did it at this time (I've been up almost 3 years and had 1.8 million hits, even as a semi-censored blog). Possibly all this Lieberman bill business made them want to forestall any government request.

I was classified as "mature" and foolishly believed that this gave me a degree of "invisibility." This complete censorship came out of the blue. I have noticed a major uptick in searchs for my blog and my listing was often at the top for a wide variety of search strings. I was getting close to 4000 hits a day and was in the 400,000 range for Alexa (I'm told is pretty good for a blog).

I am not sure what exactly I'm going to do now. I can put up the email address to the Wordpress guy who responded to my email on why they did it and people can email him about the matter, should SF allow that. Maybe enough emails might change their mind.

Let me state for the record: Soon enough they'll shut down every place on the Net for White people to freely talk. Maybe even here.

The White race cannot be allowed to talk freely in any public venue, if the Jews have their way. Are we going to let these people keep cutting off our balls forever"

**********


The reasons this blog was shut down are perfectly clear: it was a highly trafficked, successful site that spoke hard hitting truths with each and every post. That it was effective (and therefore dangerous) is a testament to that fact. When you get too big, the kikes come gunning for you. Incog did it right. A round of applause, please...

FBI = Federal Bureau of Israel?

I appreciate the way this lady toyed with these regime criminal goons and made them look as stupid as they are, but, conversing even in this round-robin fashion is a dangerous game to be playing.

It's been a while since I said it, so a refresher is in order. Always remember, when agents of ZOG approach you, no matter what alphabet soup organization or police department they belong to, invoke the 5 Words: "I have nothing to say."

She did invoke her right to remain silent...then was anything but. I chalk this up to playing it up for the cameras, knowing this would make an ego aggrandizing jewtube video. She did keep the pigs out of her house, which was the right thing to do. Never let Zog Dogs in. They want to get a gander at your reading and viewing material and they are searching for anything to give probable cause.

Don't play games with these people and don't assume you can outwit them. You just might talk yourself into something you can't get out of. Martha Stewart was locked up not for any wrong doing, but for lying to a federal agent. She talked. Don't be stupid like Martha.

"I have nothing to say!"

Who Watches the Watchmen?

Google Could Rat You Out

http://www.pcworld.com/article/191312/tech_secrets_21_things_they_dont_want_you_to_know.html

How much does Google know about you? That depends on how much you rely on its cornucopia of free services. But that stored information may easily include the Websites you visit, the search terms you use, the maps you view, your contacts and calendar, your e-mail messages, your chat history, Google Voice phone records, YouTube videos and Picasa photos, the documents you store online, your blogs and advertising accounts, your status updates on Google Buzz, your location on Google Latitude, and--if you use an Android handset--all the data associated with your cell phone, too.

If the government comes knocking with a subpoena--or even just a strongly worded letter, per the Patriot Act--Google is obligated to hand everything over. Sure, the feds can get this data from anyone, but Google's wealth of information (as well as its lengthy data-retention policies) makes their job much easier.

Even if you have nothing to hide from the authorities, all that stands between you and Christmas in July for an identity thief is your Gmail log-on and password; that's the key that unlocks every other Google service. Last October, Google reported that thousands of Gmail accounts had been compromised by a phishing scheme that also targeted AOL, MSN Hotmail, and Yahoo. Even sophisticated users have had their Gmail accounts hijacked. Little wonder, then, that Chinese hackers targeted Gmail accounts when they compromised the service last December.

The Fix: Use Google Dashboard to see what information you're sharing (prepare to be blown away), and adjust your settings accordingly. Make your Gmail password harder to guess, and change it every couple of months. If you think your Gmail account has been hacked or stolen, you may be able to use Google's account-recovery page to get it back. And given Google's recent stumbles over user privacy with Buzz, you might consider spreading the risk over different providers.

As far as this blogspot.com blog is concerned, jewgle already knows all that they need to know about me should they one day deem it necessary to try to destroy my life. I'm not particularly worried because there's no way to stuff the tooth paste back into the tube at this point, and though I try to play it safe, my level of commitment is such that there really is no turning back for me.

Readers such as Jimbo have suggested moving to a Wordpress theme, but, it's too late and I'm sure that the Watchmen are watching there too(it's not just Google involved in these monitoring activities). "Anonymity" on the web is a myth. The only way not to be discovered in some capacity is to get off the grid all together. If you ever find yourself on the lam, for God's sake, throw your cell phone out the window.

As Arizona Burns, So Shall Hollyweird

Disclaimer: I detest this disinformationist shill and the bullshit he peddles. In spite of Alex Jones's fearful demeanor in this vid and his "just wanting to get along" emasculation, it's a fairly good expose on the thing. As they say, a broken clock is right at least twice a day.



I had to check if this was even real(it appears to be) because this "Machete" thing is/was a trailer for a fake movie to accompany the 70's exploitation theme of Rodriguez and Tarantino's "Grindhouse" movies. It seems, with the aid of your tax dollars, that the idea has been fleshed out into a full blown anti-White piece of propaganda.

First, let me say to the White people who are dutifully playing their parts as the gringo villains in this steaming pile of feces: go fuck yourselves. That's directed at actual White actors and not kikejews like DeNiro who pretend to be Italian Whites. But just the same, fuck you too, Bobby. You're all soulless and you're empty, devoid of anything even resembling pride. You've got less self respect than a two dollar crack whore fumbling through a urine soaked gutter for a lost nickel while on her knees taking a load in the face.

I expect nothing less from Quentin Tarantino's butt buddy Robert Rodriguez. He's only following the anti-White lead of his partner. But Rodriguez is really going to take the prize with this one and create a White awakening that Tarantino failed to do with his anti-White "Inglorious Basterds." The problem with that garbage(which I have never seen and refuse to even borrow it from a library) is that the slack jawed White dupes have been so conditioned to cheer the deaths of their White brothers because they are Nat-zees that the jew invective aimed at their own race and ancestors went right over their shit filled heads.

This Machete "film" is really going to cause the mexcriment to hit the fan. It's a dangerous game they're playing here and the consequences of what I foresee once the mongrels are worked up by this agit-prop are going to be dire. For them. Every other ethnic group has a racial consciousness already, it's time that White people got one too. Even if they have to see their neighbor's head caved in with a shovel or a brick to get it.

It's due out in early September, and it will be a fine culmination to a long fiery summer of anti-White, anti-Tea Party vilification and invective. The powder keg that's been lit is going to be a rude but necessary awakening for our Folk.

The kike's (who are the ones really behind this, just look into it and you'll see who the producers are) are going to over play their hands in such a way with this that the blow back is going to reach all the way to their palm tree laden palaces in Sodom.

I know there will be White people going to see this atrocity, and as fans of these ass wipes Rodriquez and Tarantino they are probably anxiously marking off their calendars in anticipation of its release. May these whiggers be the first to be caught up in the destruction, preferably at the theaters while they're shoveling pop corn into their fucking yaps.




Arizona to Machete: "No. Fuck you!"




Machete will rouse far more beaners to take up arms against Whitey than this clown will at his La Raza meeting. Come and get some, maggots.

I Thought Pigs Were Unkosher?

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=494

JEWS BACK KAGAN FOR SUPREME COURT
INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN MACDONALD PhD
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2009


Bulldog dyke n' kike; coming soon to a SCOTUS near you

Brother Nathanael Kapner: What was your initial reaction to Elena Kagan’s candidacy to the Supreme Court?

Kevin MacDonald: The Jewish-owned media initially published a flurry of praises for Kagan’s candidacy. It was obvious to me that the theme of all of this is ethnic networking.

How else explain the fact that someone with a completely undistinguished scholarly record not only got tenure at the University of Chicago but was appointed dean of Harvard Law School?

Br Nathanael: What was the hype on Kagan and what indicated ethnic networking?

Kevin MacDonald: The LA Times first published, “Supreme Court Candidate Elena Kagan Has Admirers Left And Right,” written by David Savage, a Jewish journalist. Although masquerading as news, the article is a brief for the candidacy of Elena Kagan.

Savage notes that Kagan is well connected to top people in the Obama Administration, (Larry Summers being one of them), and there is effusive praise from two legal bigwigs, Laurence Tribe and Charles Fried, both of Harvard and both Jews.

More was to follow from the Huffington Post’s ”Elena Kagan Emerging As Supreme Court Front-Runner.” Once again, the same people were hyping Kagan as absolutely brilliant.

Charles Fried waxed redundant, saying, “Elena Kagan is supremely intelligent, one of the most intelligent people I have known. I think she’s a very, very intelligent person.”

The ethnic networking involved has as its backdrop Kagan being appointed Dean of Harvard Law by Lawrence Summers — also Jewish and with a strong Jewish identity. Summers and Kagan covered for Laurence Tribe when he lifted a passage from another scholar’s book without attribution. Ethnic networking is nothing if not reciprocal.

Br Nathanael: Is there a “Jewish” issue involved if Kagan is nominated?

Kevin MacDonald: The Jewish issue rears its head only slightly according to the HuffPost article: “There has been some superficial concern over Kagan’s religion — not because she’s Jewish but because without Stevens there will be no Protestants on the court.” Also, Kagan would be the first open homosexual on the court.

Br Nathanael: Really? Is Kagan a lesbian?

Kevin MacDonald: The Huffington article certainly suggests it. Also, some have written that Kagan is an “open lesbian.” Others have written that although Kagan is “not out,” she has a female partner. It is said that this is an open secret at Harvard Law School among students and faculty. In any case, Kagan has shown her commitment to gay rights.

Br Nathanael: Getting back to the Jewish issue. Is there a valid concern that if Kagan is nominated there will be no White Protestants on the Supreme Court?

Kevin MacDonald: In a country that in living memory thought of itself as WASP at its very core, it most certainly IS an issue. Without Souter and Stevens gone there will be no Protestants on the court. With Kagan, there will be three Jews and no White Protestants.
Again, in Huffington’s article, when the issue of Kagan’s homosexual orientation is addressed, they wrote, “Strategists predict that this is only a distraction not a speed bump.”

Now, who exactly are these “strategists” and what is the goal of their strategizing?

Br Nathanael: What exactly is the strategy behind the Jewish push for Kagan?

Kevin MacDonald: If Kagan is nominated and confirmed, there would be three Jewish justices on the Supreme Court — all on the left.


Maybe Kagan-thing and Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg can hook up for a little under the black robes box banging?

Jews are of course always overrepresented among elites — especially on the left, but Jews as one-third of the Supreme Court is high by any standard given that they constitute only 2% of the US population. This is much higher than the disproportionate Jewish representation in the US Senate (13%) and the House of Representatives (7%).

Three Jews on the Supreme Court seems sure to raise the eyebrows among people like me who think that Jewish identity often makes a big difference in attitudes and behavior. And if there is one area where mainstream Jewish political identity has had a huge effect, it’s in legislation related to multiculturalism. This is true of the Jewish mainstream across the board, from the far left to the neoconservative right.

Br Nathanael: Where does Kagan stand on multiculturalism? Isn’t she a conservative?

Kevin MacDonald: The amazing thing is that Kagan is being framed as a conservative. But on the issues that really count — issues related to multiculturalism and free speech — Kagan is clearly on the left and touts American Jewry’s position in these areas. Kagan’s record strongly suggests that she would be quite willing to fashion her legal arguments to attain her Jewish goals.

Kagan’s Chicago Law school article, “Regulation of Hate Speech And Pornography” indicates someone who is seeking ways to circumscribe free speech in the interests of multicultural virtue: “We live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality. Certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality. The disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation.”
Br Nathanael: Would Kagan actually rule against the 1st Amendment?”

Kevin MacDonald: In the same article, Kagan wrote that “although the Supreme Court will not in the foreseeable future adopt the view that all governmental efforts to regulate such speech accord with the Constitution, a new majority could rule that all government efforts to regulate such speech would be constitutional.” Need I say more?

Br Nathanael: Do Kagan’s views fit with the outlook of the organized Jewish community?

Kevin MacDonald: The organized Jewish community has a long record of opposing free speech related to multicultural issues. Kagan’s views fit well with the outlook of the organized Jewish community: “Every effort should be made to restrict hate speech within the current legal context and to do whatever possible to change that context so that such speech is outlawed.”

The picture that emerges is that of someone who would have no hesitation to end First Amendment freedoms and squelch any hope that a White racialist movement could achieve real power. Kagan’s vision for America is entirely within the Jewish mainstream.

And if the organized Jewish community has its way with Kagan, Jewish supremacy will reign supreme in America’s Supreme Court.


The joke's on you, Whitey

ZOG Committed to America's Destruction

High Yellow Holder: U.S. May Challenge Arizona Immigration Law



The most hateful anti-White niggers always seem to be the high yellow halfricans

The U.S. government may challenge Arizona's new immigration law, Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday as Arizona officials blamed the Feds for forcing the state into passing its own immigration enforcement mechanisms.

PHOENIX -- The U.S. government may challenge Arizona's new immigration law, Attorney General Eric Holder said Tuesday as Arizona officials blamed the Feds for forcing the state into passing its own immigration enforcement mechanisms.

Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters on Tuesday that he fears the new law is subject to abuse. He said that the Justice Department and the Homeland Security Department are in the midst of conducting a review of the state law.

The attorney general said a number of options are under consideration including the possibility of a court challenge.

Civil Rights Groups Protest Arizona Immigration Law, File Suit Over Federal Program

Arizona Republican Gov. Jan Brewer signed a bill Friday to give state police the authority to question whether an individual is in the United States legally and would consider it a crime for people to be unlawfully in the state. She said she was forced to act because Washington has failed to stop the flow of illegal immigrants and drugs from Mexico.

Opponents of the law, who have staged protests in the state capital of Phoenix since last week, used refried beans to smear swastikas on the state Capitol and have demanded a boycott of the state, have said they want to take the case to court for a judge to decide whether the state can enforce federal laws.

"If you look or sound foreign, you are going to be subjected to never-ending requests for police to confirm your identity and to confirm your citizenship," said Alessandra Soler Meetze, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arizona, which is exploring legal action.

President Obama has also questioned the legal authority for Arizona to enforce federal law, arguing it would be a violation of civil rights for state law enforcement to question the legality of an individual's residency.

Currently, many U.S. police departments do not ask about people's immigration status unless they have run afoul of the law in some other way. Many departments say stopping and questioning people will only discourage immigrants from cooperating to solve crimes.

Under the new Arizona law, immigrants unable to produce documents showing they are allowed to be in the U.S. could be arrested, jailed for up to six months and fined $2,500. That is a significant escalation of the typical federal punishment for being here illegally -- deportation.

People arrested by Arizona police would be turned over to federal immigration officers. Opponents said the federal government could thwart the law by refusing to accept them.

Supporters of the law said it is necessary to protect Arizonans. The state is home to an estimated 460,000 illegal immigrants and is the nation's busiest gateway for people slipping into the country. Brewer has ordered state officials to develop a training course for officers to learn what constitutes reasonable suspicion that someone is in the U.S. illegally.

The crux of opponents' arguments is that only the federal government has the authority to regulate immigration.

"If every state had its own laws, we wouldn't be one country; we'd be 50 different countries," said Thomas Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Kevin Johnson, dean of the law school at the University of California-Davis and an immigration law professor, said such a lawsuit would have a very good chance of success. He said the state law gets into legal trouble by giving local law enforcement officers the authority to enforce immigration laws.

However, Gerald Neuman, a Harvard Law School professor, said Arizona could make a compelling legal argument that it has overlapping authority to protect its residents.

Kris Kobach, a University of Missouri-Kansas City law professor who helped write the Arizona legislation, said he anticipated legal challenges and carefully drafted the language. He said the state law is only prohibiting conduct already illegal under federal law.

Jon Garrido, who produces a Hispanic website and ran unsuccessfully last year for Phoenix City Council, told The Arizona Republic Monday he pulled organizing papers for a petition drive to repeal the law. A referendum would require the signature of 76,682 registered voters to get on the November ballot. If successful, the effort would block the law from taking effect until the vote.

San Francisco's city attorney has urged policymakers in the city to stop dealing with Arizona and Arizona businesses. Leaders in Mexico also demanded a boycott, as did civil rights leader Al Sharpton.

During a town hall meeting Monday in Tucson, Brewer dismissed the threat of a boycott, saying she doesn't believe the law is "going to have the kind of economic impact that some people think it might," the Arizona Daily Star reported.

The law has strong public support in Arizona, where passions have been running high since a rancher was killed close to the Mexican border last month, apparently by drug smugglers from across the border.

Another Domino Falls

Denying Holocaust Made a Crime in Hungary

Dey vas holocausted. How do we know? Because deez are pictures of the victims, sir! Just like picture of pile of shoes...da evidence does not lie. Ya. Dats da vey.



Hungarian President Laszlo Solyom signed a law which threatens a three-year sentence for anyone who denies that the "Holocaust" happened, reported Associated Press.

The law was adopted last month by Parliament and later approved by the head of state, who found it does not violate the constitution.

Earlier versions of the draft law, which would have criminalized being pro-Nazi or pro-Hungarian Communist regime, were rejected. The ruling Hungarian Socialist Party and the Jewish community in the country both greeted the new legislation. About 550,000 Hungarian Jews and 50,000 Gypsies were murdered during the Holocaust.

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n2/content/view/31146/


Jobbik Party, where are you?!

Arthur Kemp: Jews? What Jews?

Arthur Kemp, the British variant of our own kosher kahnservatives, says, with a presumably straight face, that all of this talk of kikejews is nothing but "conspiracy theory".

Well, he's correct in saying there is no conspiracy. Conspiracy implies some sort of clandestine plot carried out covertly, in absolute secrecy. No, the ZOG carries out its treachery in the broad light of day for all with half a brain and a working pair of eyes to see. Media control and ownership is more than just "good business" acumen; it's the pipeline to pump their perversion and lies into the homes and minds of every White Amerikwan under their boot heel. But, if you're reading this, I likely don't have to tell you any of this.

I can't make any conclusion other than to say that Kemp and the BNP are really nothing more than a compromised, jew infiltrated disinformationist false front and controlled opposition. If they can only even exist by playing the kike's game, then they've already failed. I hear that Kemp is a wanted man in South Africa and is likely denying the jew behind the curtain because he doesn't want his kike overlords to extradite him to an ANC gulag for not playing nice.

You can tell a lot about where these clowns are coming from by how they view the fighting element of the bowel movement; those who will one day be wearing the actual boots that hit the ground. Kemp wants to remove the "cancers" of WN such as Christian Identity. He'd rather you vote for a back pedaling coward like Ron "I'm not a racist or anti-semite" Paul, or some other such empty suit. The goofy bastard isn't going to stop his own country from drowning in a tidal wave of mud much less "kick out" of the "movement" who he deems inappropriate to his panty waist sensibilities.

And I still listen to Jim Giles, if only for the entertainment value. I can't help but conclude that he's a fucking fruit loop. This guy is so easily influenced by whoever he's talking to at the moment, that it's almost like he doesn't have a brain of his own. The interview with Mark "the punk" Potok of the SPLC was some of the most nauseating ass kissing you're ever likely to hear. The interview with Tim "not White like me because I'm a jew" Wise wasn't much better as he gave the dipshit uninterrupted air time to spew his anti-White venom. It does, however, point out what a non-entity and light weight pussy this Fade the Bitcher/Cunter Wallace kid is, because he's the only interview subject I've ever heard Giles verbally pistol whip, and sent him face first through the "Overton Window" he was trying to sell.

Giles has been advocating for the past few months about running for localized state representative office. Those comprising the "hard core nucleus" are to go door to door and say "Hello, I'm so and so, and I am running a pro-White anti-nigger campaign." You see, Giles used to say he was running an anti-zionist, pro-White campaign, but Arty set him straight and showed him the folly of his ways. His "blue tick nose" told him Kemp was onto something, speakin' all eloquent an' such, like he knowed a thing or two about a thing or two.

If only the damned helicopters would stop flying over his $16,000(recently depreciated down to $10,000) trailer at the end of his 1700 foot gravel road.

Israel's Bitch(literally)

Bachmann: America ‘cursed’ by God ‘if we reject Israel’


Kike loving, jew boot licking republicunt vomits her heresies


At a Republican Jewish Coalition event in Los Angeles last week, Rep. Michele Bachmann offered a candid view of her positions on Israel: Support for Israel is handed down by God and if the United States pulls back its support, America will cease to exist.

The Republican Jewish Coalition is the same organization that recently hired former Sen. Norm Coleman. Bachmann’s appearance on Feb.1 is part of a whirlwind of national events for Bachmann in February. Next up: she’s keynoting the Take Back Washington North Dakota event in Bismarck this Friday night.

Here’s a transcript of some of her remarks at the RJC event:

I am convinced in my heart and in my mind that if the United States fails to stand with Israel, that is the end of the United States . . . [W]e have to show that we are inextricably entwined, that as a nation we have been blessed because of our relationship with Israel, and if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play. And my husband and I are both Christians, and we believe very strongly the verse from Genesis [Genesis 12:3], we believe very strongly that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel. It is a strong and beautiful principle. Right now in my own private Bible time, I am working through Isaiah . . . and there is continually a coming back to what God gave to Israel initially, which was the Torah and the Ten Commandments, and I have a wonderful quote from John Adams that if you will indulge me [while I find it] . . . [from his February 16, 1809 letter to François Adriaan van der Kemp]:

"I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist, and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations. If I were an atheist of the other sect, who believe or pretend to believe that all is ordered by chance, I should believe that chance had ordered the Jews to preserve and propagate to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization."

. . . So that is a very long way to answer your question, but I believe that an explicit statement from us about our support for Israel as tied to American security, we would do well to do that.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/55061/bachmann-america-cursed-by-god-if-we-reject-israel


I can't believe there are still some of you out there who honestly believe that there is a difference between the two inept, bought and paid for political parties, and you are buying into this "liberal versus conservative" shell game. It's a single party that comprises an elite establishment club and the goal of any candidate or elected official is to get in and ride the money train, get as much of the pilfered loot as they possibly can, and then retire in splendor. The partisan bickering you see on your cable news programs is merely entertainment to get the rubes fired up for one "side" or the other.

Fealty to Israel, is, of course, the quickest way not only to lucrative profitability and a comfortable life filled with amenities, it also insures you holding a seat on the money train by being re-elected cycle after cycle, either until you decide to leave of your own accord with your cash and prizes or decide to test the tether of your kikejew masters and they destroy you politically.

This Bachmann lunatic is a different kind of animal all together. Yes, she's flush with kike shekels and I know for a fact that she and her family have been wined and dined on the jew's dime with trips to Isra-hell.* But, she strikes me as one of these zio-"christian" nut bags who actually believe this "G_d's Self Chosen" clap trap. The perversions and obscenities spewed by this deranged whore regarding kike parasites is utterly revolting, so much so that my skin crawls and I can feel the bile creeping up my esophagus.

* Comment from Karl, a reader of the Minnesota Independent on this story:

"It’s no wonder Bachmann speaks so fondly of Israel. They’ve provided her and her family members free annual vacations to Israel every year she’s been in office–to the tune of $44,380.

Most recently, in July-August 2009, Bachmann and her daughter traveled to Tel Aviv on the dime of the American Israel Education Foundation, living like royalty in $500-a-night hotels. Cost of the trip for Michele and Elisa Bachmann: $19,414.74, covered entirely by the Jewish group, which is affiliated with the powerful pro-Israel lobbying group AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee). They each even got a nice photo album from their hosts as a momento of their junket.

In 2008, Bachmann and her husband, Marcus, traveled to Jeruselum, this time courtesy of the Jewish Community Relations Council. Cost of trip: $7,170.

In 2007, Michele and Marcus jaunted off to Tel Aviv with the American Israel Education Foundation picking up the tab again, including luxurious $436/night hotels. Cost: $17,796.

It’s not like Minnesota’s 6th District is heavily Jewish or anything. That matters little to our bought-and-paid-for congresswoman. What really matters is that for their $44,380 investment in Bachmann, the Israeli/Jewish lobbyists, er, “educators,” have gotten a loud mouthpiece to drum up support for Israel among the evangelical Christian base."

Transparency statement regarding the August 2009 trip to Tel-Aviv can be found here:

http://www.legistorm.com/trip/31496.html

And let us not forget that this timely reminder is just another propaganda piece to prime the sheeple for accepting an apocalyptic war with Iran...for israel's benefit of course.

These regime criminals are all guilty, only differentiated by the varying degrees of their culpability. In a perfect world, such treasonous bitches and bastards would be dragged through the streets before their mutilated corpses are hung in the public square. That they paid lip service to this or that pet issue of yours(in order to get your vote) does not merit mercy. To offer it is akin to letting the fox back in the hen house to resume his steady diet of poultry. We (or whoever picks up the pieces after we're gone) had better be smarter than that.

"Oath Keepers": The Latest Patriot Drag Net And False Flag Operation

OATH KEEPERS


Would you saddle up with a group who has "friends" like this?





















http://oathkeepers.org/oath/

OATH KEEPERS

They pledge to prevent dictatorship!
Police, military to stand down in response to unlawful orders.

Gateway Created in March by 44-year-old Stewart Rhodes, Oath Keepers is a 'nonpartisan group' of current and retired law enforcement, military, and related personnel who vow to fulfill their oaths to the Constitution.

They pledge to disobey 'illegal' orders, including directives to disarm people, and to prevent cities from becoming "giant concentration camps," which he foresees happening in the coming years.
"The whole point of Oath Keepers is to stop a dictatorship from ever happening here," said the Yale-trained lawyer and former Army paratrooper.

"My focus is on the guys with the guns, because they can't do it without them. We say if the American people decide it's time for a revolution, 'we'll fight with you'."
et tu Brut� In a July report, Return of the Militias, the Alabama-based Southern Poverty Law Center singled out Oath Keepers as "a particularly worrisome example of the Patriot revival." It's the "cross-pollinating" of extremist groups -- some racist and some not -- that concerns Mark Potok.

TT says: Two things happened after Homeland Security and the SPLC released reports: Membership of Oath Keepers spiked dramatically, and Rhodes has had to suck up to the KikeJew infested patriotard right wing.

"We're not a militia," he said. "We're not part and parcel of the white supremacist movement. I loathe white supremacists!" (Take that statement into account, then go and read the "Ten Orders We Will Never Obey". So long as those the State has deemed a threat are painted as either "White Supremacists" or "Muslims" or "Atheists" or whatever these goofballs fear the most, they will do their duty for "God and Country" never seeing the jew behind the curtain who is manipulating them for his own ends just as he always has.)

The group is not monolithic, however, as its Montana state director contends that Montana, and other states, should consider seceding from the Union!
"There are thousands of Americans who go to Lexington to watch re-enactments of people shooting at troops," said Rhodes; "the military and police may find this offensive."

He wants to create a legal defense fund for Oath Keepers who are disciplined for defying orders they deem unlawful or immoral:
Orders We Will Not Obey

TT says: A few years ago, beginning in the 80s when the Militias were rising, everything was 'Hunky Dorey'... until the Oklahoma City job. Then they disappeared overnight, and these were people who said they hated big government -- the System. Timothy McVeigh DID hate it, but HE acted. The worn out reactionary right could not admit that McVeigh really WAS what they claimed to be. Although McVeigh was not a White supremacist or an Insurgent, (both he and Terry Nichols were either married to, or had bedded down with Filipinos), he deserves respect nonetheless.

Now here comes a probable false flag outfit created in the Militia mold. Oath Keepers claim extreme resistance to the state, but I'll believe it when I see it. Too many of them are Jew thinking Christian Zionists and can never be trusted. Watch them, infiltrate them, but don't fall for their rhetoric. Keep your powder dry and maintain a low profile. Our time is coming. Allow these reactionaries to make their move, and the System too. Before this is over, many an Oath Keeper will be as deadly an enemy as the Jew World Order itself. -- Tom Metzger

I'm in concurrence with Terrible Tommy. As Jeff was mentioning on a previous thread, these "militias" are little more than traps used to identify and round up true Patriots. Insurgency(carried out in single cell and underground) is the only way. Meetings and membership cards make it as easy as shooting fish in a barrel for Fed stooges. Don't be duped.

Cyber Mossad: "By Trolling Thou Shall Wage War"

Zionist Trolls Who Infect The Internet
























"Shlomo! You should see dis! Get on over to da Stormfront. I got the goyim over there vermisht, verclempt I tell ya! Ya, dats da vey..."




Israel’s propagandists shoot themselves in the foot as they shoot off their mouths

"If you’ve come across a hasbarat, on-line or otherwise, you have learned that no amount of reasoned argument or intellectual maturity has any effect. That’s because hasbarats don’t care if they come across as ignorant, obnoxious, nasty or inane. All that matters for them is sabotaging criticism of Israel and support for Muslims. They're like anti-intellectual stink bombs: designed to cause maximum discomfort but have little if any real power."
“Our people will not say: ‘Hello, I am from the hasbara department of the Israeli foreign ministry … They will speak as net-surfers and as citizens, and will write responses that will look personal but will be based on a prepared list of messages that the foreign ministry developed.”



-- Ilan Shturman, Israel’s deputy director of strategic lying



If you have ever visited a blog or on-line discussion group on the Middle East(or White Nationalist forums and blogs!) you have doubtless had the misfortune to run into them.

They are known by the language they use: depraved sexual insults, bile, bigotry, threats, disinformation and character assassination. That’s right: I’m talking about “hasbarats,” zionist trolls who infect the Internet with hasbara, pro-Israel propaganda. Of course, mainstream media hasbarats have been around for decades, as have “hasbaratchiks,” fifth-columns in foreign governments who subvert national policies to serve Israel. The Internet, though, is the latest, some might say the greatest, propaganda playground, and Israel cannot cope with factual, passionate, well-documented stories that expose its war crimes and unrepentant criminality.

If you’ve come across a hasbarat, on-line or otherwise, you have learned that no amount of reasoned argument or intellectual maturity has any effect. That’s because hasbarats don’t care if they come across as ignorant, obnoxious, nasty or inane. All that matters for them is sabotaging criticism of Israel and support for Muslims. They're like anti-intellectual stink bombs: designed to cause maximum discomfort but have little if any real power.

This deliberate proliferation of on-line hasbarats raises two points. The first concerns why anyone would spend hours a day to prostitute themselves for Israel. Money, of course. Ilan Shturman, deputy director of the Israeli foreign ministry’s hasbara department (!), told an Israeli business newspaper in July that US$150,000 had been allocated for the first stage of a campaign to seed the Internet with hasbarats:



“Our people will not say: ‘Hello, I am from the hasbara department of the Israeli foreign ministry and I want to tell you the following.’ Nor will they necessarily identify themselves as Israelis. They will speak as net-surfers and as citizens, and will write responses that will look personal but will be based on a prepared list of messages that the foreign ministry developed.”


The second point is why Israel felt it had to resort to intellectual fraud on an international scale. The Internet has shown that Israel is a failed oppressor state that commits crimes against humanity as a matter of policy. The last straw for many was “Operation Cast Lead,” an act of such unspeakable unapologetic sadism that allusions to Nazi Germany are entirely appropriate.

Every day, it seems, the mythic foundations of Israel’s legitimacy--the holocaust, Jewish victimhood, Jewish “people,” Israeli “democracy,” “evil” Muslims--are exposed for all to see.

In January, Amir Gissin, Israel’s consul-general in Toronto, sent out a hasbara recruitment letter, which read in part: “If you are frustrated or concerned with the portrayal of Israel in Canadian News and with biased [sic] depictions, your voice can be heard. Now, think that you’re not alone 10,000 voices like yours can respond every day: praise, protest, inform, correct on leading Canadian news websites, in real time, effectively.”

The weakness with this tactic, as you probably figured out, is that hasbarats will inevitably shout and whine themselves into irrelevance. Eventually, intelligent people will tune out the zionist boilerplate, the anti-Muslim smears, and the interminable drone about the holocaust. Already, the once-dreaded epithet “anti-Semite” has lost all significance, as if it ever had any, and the person who hurled it is more likely to be mocked than feared.

Two recent events demonstrate the growing desperation and ineptitude of Israel’s propaganda industry. Today, we look at an example of “positive hasbara.”

Toronto International Film Festival

A major tactic of hasbarats is to project the illusion that Israel is a normal Western democracy, thereby taking focus away from Israel’s mistreatment of Palestinians. Also, countries that buy into the deceit will be unwilling to criticize Israel for fear of calling into question their role in covering up zionist war crimes.

This tactic was tried at the recent Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) as Tel Aviv was spotlighted in a City-to-City program with Toronto. The ostensible purpose was to use an apolitical, cultural event to obscure the tyranny that Tel Aviv represents, but more than 1,000 filmmakers and performers, weren’t fooled. They put their names to The Toronto Declaration: No Celebration of Occupation, an open letter to the TIFF that protested the co-optation of the festival by the Israeli propaganda machine.

The protest accomplished precisely what the hasbarats tried to prevent. “Rather than talking about Israel’s rich cinematic culture, the buzz this week in Toronto has centered on the one thing Israeli officials had sought to avoid: the conflict with the Palestinians,” reported the Jewish Telegraph Agency.

Another major defeat for Israel came courtesy of Chicago Sun-Times movie critic Roger Ebert. After offering a knee-jerk condemnation of the City-to-City protests, he reversed himself the next day:

“I wasn't prepared with enough facts about the events leading up to the Festival's decision to showcase Tel Aviv in the City-to-City section. I [initially] thought of it as an innocent goodwill gesture, but now realize it was part of a deliberate plan to ‘re-brand’ Israel in Toronto, as a pilot for a larger such program. The Festival should never have agreed to be used like this. It was naïve for the plan’s supporters to believe it would have the effect they hoped for.”

Speaking of naïve, how about Ron Huldai, mayor of Tel Aviv! Whether out of overconfidence or stupidity, he publicly admitted the underlying hasbara in an interview with the JTA: “While the City to City program was initiated by the festival, the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs was involved as part of its Brand Israel media and advertising campaign, which was launched last year.”

Quite obviously, Israel would have been better off if the hasbarats had not tried to manipulate the festival. Even the predictable pro-Israel counter-protest merely added to the protest’s notoriety and detracted from the cultural propaganda. Moreover the standard claim that the protest was an attack on Israel and artistic freedom was demonstrably false. If anything, the protest highlighted Israel’s active suppression of Palestinian culture. According to the authors of the Toronto Declaration:

“Many Palestinian artists and filmmakers, denied freedom of movement by Israel’s Occupation and pass system, are de facto boycotted, unable to communicate with their communities or travel freely. The double standard is mind-boggling and, slowly, these are the issues we are helping to put under a spotlight.”

Finally, it is important to note that the Declaration’s authors succeeded without any media help. They had no money to place ads, and no newspaper would publish their open letter. On the other hand, hasbarats had the full support (read: “obedience”) of Canada’s national media, and lost.

If a modest, unfunded, popular protest can effectively defeat an orchestrated propaganda campaign, what does that say about Israel’s ability to pose as a legitimate, democratic state? Even though hasbarats get their disinformation out with relative ease, it is not clear that is generally accepted.

http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/66780


I think this is yet another sign that points to how close the kikejews are to completely crumbling under the weight of full exposure. The desperation lay in the fact that these agents provacateur(and we have all encountered them) do not even attempt reasoned debate. Even though their positions are untenable when exposed by the glaring light of truth, the fear that these tactics betray is palpable. We even have some kike columnist saying that child rapist kikejew Roman Polanski is being "holocausted" all over again by being brought to justice for the rape of a 13 year old girl whom he drugged and violently sodomized three decades ago. These straws being grasped at are slipping away with each outlandish lie and invocation of past jewish suffer-ink. This hubris, as I've said time and time again, will be their ultimate undoing. My only hope is that I live long enough to see full justice administered when the time does come for these hell spawns to atone for their multitude of crimes.

Neo-cohen hopes kikejews will see that Obongo is not da vey

Norm Podhoretz is a neocon(a "conservative" kikejew or goy ally thereof who cares only about "foreign policy", that is to say, "israel" exclusively) and one of the chief architects of the Iraq war, a misadventure that was to be the first in a series of conflicts to annihilate israel's perceived enemies in the region(Iran, Iraq, Syria). Like all of the jewish neo-cohens, he is a "former" Trotskyite leftist who, finding no traction for their agenda in liberal circles, infiltrated and hijacked the Republican party. I would also add that he, along with Paul Wolfowitz, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, Charles Krautmammer, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and a host of other criminal heebs should be executed for war crimes.

But a curious thing is happening. The jewish commitment to the Marxist liberalism and the destruction of White Western civilization is beginning to conflict with the well being of the bandit state. Obongo, who is not aware that he has a leash around his ape neck, has not demonstrated a significant amount of concern for izrahell. In fact, he's quite indifferent. I can even detect the slightest hint of hostility towards the subject. A man who actually believes he serves because of the will of the people and is an autonomous executive is a dangerous thing to the puppet masters. It will prove to be even more dangerous for Barry himself, when the Mossad decide that he is no longer useful.

Why do I say this? Since jews are in command of the situation, they care very little who comes out on top in these dog and pony show "elections". They are confident that whoever it is, they will swiftly bring him under their control and enforce compliance. Until now. The war at all costs with Iran that the kikes have been salivating over and anxiously rubbing their hands together in anticipation of, has stalled. Barry will not budge. (I expect a false flag op whereby the Mossad causes an international incident which will be blamed on the Iranians, but this is a topic for another day. )

Podhoretz knows that the prospect of Amerikwa doing the parasite state's dirty work becomes less likely with each passing day. So, here he is, urging his fellow kikejews to do the right thing for israel. Join the republican party. This wont happen. For as much as "Judeo" Christians bow in awe before these devils, jews despise them even more than they do the average goy. In the words of "blue collar" comedian Ron White, "I don't think so, scooter."

While the jews have a tight control on our government, media and institutions, they cannot control everything. Sometimes the events they set in motion conflict and come into diametric opposition, creating unintended consequences, including things that may destroy them along with the intended host. I believe that is the underlying reason for this article.

Why Are Jews Liberals?

"I'm hoping buyer's remorse on Obama will finally cause a kikejew shift to the right."

By NORMAN PODHORETZ

One of the most extraordinary features of Barack Obama's victory over John McCain was his capture of 78% of the Jewish vote. To be sure, there was nothing extraordinary about the number itself. Since 1928, the average Jewish vote for the Democrat in presidential elections has been an amazing 75%—far higher than that of any other ethno-religious group. (and yet some still fail to make the connection between these subversive nation wreckers and all of the filth we are neck deep in.)

Yet there were reasons to think that it would be different in 2008. The main one was Israel. Despite some slippage in concern for Israel among American Jews, most of them were still telling pollsters that their votes would be strongly influenced by the positions of the two candidates on the Jewish state. This being the case, Mr. McCain's long history of sympathy with Israel should have given him a distinct advantage over Mr. Obama, whose own history consisted of associating with outright enemies of the Jewish state like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the historian Rashid Khalidi.(This lays bare the outright hatred they have for White Western civilization and Christianity. It's also called "cutting off your nose to spite your face.")

Heebs for Obongo. Podhoretz says dis vas not da vey.

Nevertheless, Mr. Obama beat Mr. McCain among Jewish voters by a staggering 57 points. Except for African Americans, who gave him 95% of their vote, Mr. Obama did far better with Jews than with any other ethnic or religious group. Thus the Jewish vote for him was 25 points higher than the 53% he scored with the electorate as a whole; 35 points higher than the 43% he scored with whites; 11 points higher than the 67% he scored with Hispanics; 33 points higher than the 45% he scored with Protestants; and 24 points higher than the 54% he scored with Catholics.

These numbers remind us of the extent to which the continued Jewish commitment to the Democratic Party has become an anomaly. All the other ethno-religious groups that, like the Jews, formed part of the coalition forged by Franklin Delano Roosevelt(crypto jew) in the 1930s have followed the rule that increasing prosperity generally leads to an increasing identification with the Republican Party. But not the Jews. As the late Jewish scholar Milton Himmelfarb said in the 1950s: "Jews earn like Episcopalians"—then the most prosperous minority group in America—"and vote like Puerto Ricans," who were then the poorest.

Jews also remain far more heavily committed to the liberal agenda than any of their old ethno-religious New Deal partners. As the eminent sociologist Nathan Glazer has put it, "whatever the promptings of their economic interests," Jews have consistently supported "increased government spending, expanded benefits to the poor and lower classes, greater regulations on business, and the power of organized labor."(and illegal third world immigration, "civil rights", fomentation of anti-White and anti-Christian sentiment, destruction of the nuclear family, normalization of homosexuality and pedophilia, pornography, miscegenation, abortion, and nearly every other vile thing leads a slug trail back to the jew.)

As with these old political and economic questions, so with the newer issues being fought out in the culture wars today. On abortion, gay rights, school prayer, gun control and assisted suicide, the survey data show that Jews are by far the most liberal of any group in America.(This is called "stating the obvious.")

Most American Jews sincerely believe that their liberalism, together with their commitment to the Democratic Party as its main political vehicle, stems from the teachings of Judaism and reflects the heritage of "Jewish values."(more like "Talmudic values") But if this theory were valid, the Orthodox would be the most liberal sector of the Jewish community. After all, it is they who are most familiar with the Jewish religious tradition and who shape their lives around its commandments.(Which merely substantiates the point that their subversive nature has little to do with their "religion".)

Yet the Orthodox enclaves are the only Jewish neighborhoods where Republican candidates get any votes to speak of. Even more telling is that on every single cultural issue, the Orthodox oppose the politically correct liberal positions taken by most other American Jews precisely because these positions conflict with Jewish law. To cite just a few examples: Jewish law permits abortion only to protect the life of the mother; it forbids sex between men; and it prohibits suicide (except when the only alternatives are forced conversion or incest).(C'mon, Norm. It's not that hard to figure out. The kikejew is "a people apart." It's perfectly fine for the goyim to defile themselves, it's even a kike's duty to encourage it while at the same time profitting from it.)

The upshot is that in virtually every instance of a clash between Jewish law and contemporary liberalism, it is the liberal creed that prevails for most American Jews. Which is to say that for them, liberalism has become more than a political outlook. It has for all practical purposes superseded Judaism and become a religion in its own right.(these Kazar devils are not the least bit "religious". Judaism exists solely to prop up their "self chosen" claim.) And to the dogmas and commandments of this religion they give the kind of steadfast devotion their forefathers gave to the religion of the Hebrew Bible. For many, moving to the right is invested with much the same horror their forefathers felt about conversion to Christianity.

All this applies most fully to Jews who are Jewish only in an ethnic sense. Indeed, many such secular Jews, when asked how they would define "a good Jew," reply that it is equivalent to being a good liberal.(I define a "good jew" as one who is dead, or boarding a plane for Tel-Aviv with one way ticket in hand.)

But avowed secularists are not the only Jews who confuse Judaism with liberalism; so do many non-Orthodox Jews who practice this or that traditional observance. It is not for nothing that a cruel wag has described the Reform movement—the largest of the religious denominations within the American Jewish community—as "the Democratic Party with holidays thrown in," and the services in a Reform temple as "the Democratic Party at prayer."

As a Jew who moved from left to right more than four decades ago, I have been hoping for many years that my fellow Jews would come to see that in contrast to what was the case in the past, our true friends are now located not among liberals, but among conservatives.(This is what Commander Rockwell referred to as "friends of the Captain, friends of the Crew")

Of course in speaking of the difference between left and right, or between liberals and conservatives, I have in mind a divide wider than the conflict between Democrats and Republicans and deeper than electoral politics. The great issue between the two political communities is how they feel about the nature of American society. With all exceptions duly noted, I think it fair to say that what liberals mainly see when they look at this country is injustice and oppression of every kind—economic, social and political. By sharp contrast, conservatives see a nation shaped by a complex of traditions, principles and institutions that has afforded more freedom and, even factoring in periodic economic downturns, more prosperity to more of its citizens than in any society in human history. It follows that what liberals believe needs to be changed or discarded—and apologized for to other nations—is precisely what conservatives are dedicated to preserving, reinvigorating and proudly defending against attack.

In this realm, too, American Jewry surely belongs with the conservatives rather than the liberals. For the social, political and moral system that liberals wish to transform is the very system in and through which Jews found a home such as they had never discovered in all their forced wanderings throughout the centuries over the face of the earth.(Is Norm basically saying that Amerikwa is the ultimate parasite haven?)

The Jewish immigrants who began coming here from Eastern Europe in the 1880s were right to call America "the golden land." They soon learned that there was no gold in the streets, as some of them may have imagined, which meant that they had to struggle, and struggle hard. But there was another, more precious kind of gold in America. There was freedom and there was opportunity. Blessed with these conditions, we children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren of these immigrants flourished—and not just in material terms—to an extent unmatched in the history of our people.(Expecting a people with subversion and nation wrecking in their very DNA to adopt a different way is like trying to get a lion to lose his taste for zebra meat.)

What I am saying is that if anything bears eloquent testimony to the infinitely precious virtues of the traditional American system, it is the Jewish experience in this country. Surely, then, we Jews ought to be joining with its defenders against those who are blind or indifferent or antagonistic to the philosophical principles, the moral values, and the socioeconomic institutions on whose health and vitality the traditional American system depends.(Kind of hard to do, Norm, when you are operating under the over riding command to topple the crown jewel of Western civilization.)

In 2008, we were faced with a candidate who ran to an unprecedented degree on the premise that the American system was seriously flawed and in desperate need of radical change—not to mention a record powerfully indicating that he would pursue policies dangerous to the security of Israel. Because of all this, I hoped that my fellow Jews would finally break free of the liberalism to which they have remained in thrall long past the point where it has served either their interests or their ideals.(Norm, you're killing me here. I'll have to wipe away the tears of laughter before proceeding.)

That possibility having been resoundingly dashed, I now grasp for some encouragement from the signs that buyer's remorse is beginning to set in among Jews, as it also seems to be doing among independents. Which is why I am hoping against hope that the exposure of Mr. Obama as a false messiah will at last open the eyes of my fellow Jews to the correlative falsity of the political creed he so perfectly personifies and to which they have for so long been so misguidedly loyal. (the leopard does not change his spots...)