Politics As Usual

It appears that it is now official. Israel's favorite boot licking, bought and paid for shabbas goy toady is going to make a run for the Whore House. All you really need to know about this lunatic is contained in the brief video above. New readers can refer to the piece I did on mizz Bachmann last year.

Is Bachmann a crypto-jew? Who goes to a "kibbutz" unless they are a chosenite?



In 2008, Bachmann appeared on the drooling faggot Chris Matthews' show "Hardball" calling for a "media investigation" of all the "anti-American" politicians in the Congress. This traitorous harpy should have first looked in her own mirror. Pledging one's allegiance to a foreign, alien power is an act of treason. In fact, it's about the most subversive, treacherous act of national betrayal one could possibly engage in.

Not that I expected it to be any different, but this years crop of Republicunt contenders amounts to a clownish collection of empty suited cyphers, perennial candidates, and rotting left over retreads from the last election. If none of those are to your liking there is always the boot lipped nigger Herman Cain. An endorsement of Herman will assuage that White Guilt and protect you(not really) from the "racist" tag, as is the primary concern of Tea Party retards. And don't worry about the color thing. AIPAC left a big pile of money on Whoring Herman's night stand, so you know he's "right" on Israel!

Ron Paul? Are you people still falling for that old line of bullshit? If anyone in pro-White circles is still placing their hopes in this goofy charlatan, then they are fucking stupid. Lone Wolf of Thy Weapon of War has a must read analysis of the Paul Delusion that should rub the sleep from the eyes of those not yet awake to reality.

The sad thing is, once you see the whole system for what it truly is, you become jaded. There is no refuge in the Blight Wing, even on an entertainment level. I have read most of Ann Coulter's books and even really liked a couple of them. She put a new one out a few weeks ago and I was thinking about buying it. The first barrier to me actually putting my money down was the premise of the book stated in the subtitle "Demonic: How The Liberal Mob Is Endangering America."

Sorry, but when I think of "mobs" that are "endangering America" I tend to envision scenes like what's been going on in Chicago, Illinois for the past two months, with shitskin savages running amok, targeting White victims. Not feminized birkenstock wearing hippies swinging their purses at a rally for fag "marriage."

The second thing that turned me off was the requisite press tour. Goofy Ann, flipping her locks around like a dimbo-bimbo, jabbering back and forth with the T.V. talking heads like she's on dope. Then she's going on about Thurgood Marshall. Not to bash him, but in proclaiming him as some kind of new found hero! She praised him for his legal skills in arguing Brown vs. Board of Education. You know, the landmark decision that opened the gates of hell, exposing subsequent generations of White children to rape, assault, robbery, intimidation and general TNB. Yeah, Ann thinks that was great.

She also thinks Michael(a.k.a. Martin Loofer) King is great too. Because he "peacefully" stood up to the "vicious racist"(her words) Bull Connor who was a ~gasp~ democrat! (I guess Ann doesn't know about the mudsharks and jewesses who were fornicating with nigger bucks on people's lawns, and savages defecating in public which enraged the communities we see in those old news reels).

Eventually I did make it to a book store and leafed through the thing to see what the general tone was. I read with interest a passage on the Ku Klux Klan. They belonged to the democrat party and terrorized "african-americans" and, yes, I'm not making this up, they also tormented "republicans." Generally, it was just a trite tome, beating the dead horse of partisan politics, which never gets any deeper than "republicans good, democrats bad". The jew was not named, nor were any racial truths revealed(surprise!). I set the book back on the shelf and walked away, concluding that the only thing "demonic" about this waste of precious timber were the lies and distortions put to paper by this hideous crone who does herself no favors by draping her cadaverous body with a slinky black dress in order to sell books to sexually repressed conservatards. The grapefruit sized adam's apple, the sunken cheeks, hallowed out eye sockets, man hands, knobby knees and bones protruding through her skin don't really do much for me.

But being jaded by the waste land of politics and media isn't such a bad thing. You can at least say with some confidence "wont get fooled again."

It helps if you've got a pair of these:

"Hoe-leeeee shit. There's a lot more jews walkin' around than I thought!"

The new republican boss. Same as the old democrat boss

Kikejews Shut Down Incogman

As most of you know by now, Incogman's Wordpress blog has been flushed down the memory hole by the usual suspects, in this case some kikejew hasbarats who set up Incogman for his fall by posting comments advocating violence, from my understanding of the situation.

I like Incog and have a tremendous amount of respect for his writing as well as his unwavering commitment to exposing the jew for the subversive nation wrecking parasites that they truly are. Before I ever laid eyes on his blog, I lurked at Stormfront and he was one of the most notable posters that I have yet to come across there.

The thing I disliked most about Incog's blog(though not really his fault) and the very thing that ultimately led to it being put in the recycle bin, was the high number of shit disturbing hasbarats who hijacked threads and just generally stunk up the place with vile jewthink.

May he go on to a self hosted Wordpress theme and redouble his efforts against the forces of pure evil.

Incog speaks: "Yes, they did shut me down. Permanently.

Although I have no specific knowledge of why they did it at this time (I've been up almost 3 years and had 1.8 million hits, even as a semi-censored blog). Possibly all this Lieberman bill business made them want to forestall any government request.

I was classified as "mature" and foolishly believed that this gave me a degree of "invisibility." This complete censorship came out of the blue. I have noticed a major uptick in searchs for my blog and my listing was often at the top for a wide variety of search strings. I was getting close to 4000 hits a day and was in the 400,000 range for Alexa (I'm told is pretty good for a blog).

I am not sure what exactly I'm going to do now. I can put up the email address to the Wordpress guy who responded to my email on why they did it and people can email him about the matter, should SF allow that. Maybe enough emails might change their mind.

Let me state for the record: Soon enough they'll shut down every place on the Net for White people to freely talk. Maybe even here.

The White race cannot be allowed to talk freely in any public venue, if the Jews have their way. Are we going to let these people keep cutting off our balls forever"

**********


The reasons this blog was shut down are perfectly clear: it was a highly trafficked, successful site that spoke hard hitting truths with each and every post. That it was effective (and therefore dangerous) is a testament to that fact. When you get too big, the kikes come gunning for you. Incog did it right. A round of applause, please...

FBI = Federal Bureau of Israel?

I appreciate the way this lady toyed with these regime criminal goons and made them look as stupid as they are, but, conversing even in this round-robin fashion is a dangerous game to be playing.

It's been a while since I said it, so a refresher is in order. Always remember, when agents of ZOG approach you, no matter what alphabet soup organization or police department they belong to, invoke the 5 Words: "I have nothing to say."

She did invoke her right to remain silent...then was anything but. I chalk this up to playing it up for the cameras, knowing this would make an ego aggrandizing jewtube video. She did keep the pigs out of her house, which was the right thing to do. Never let Zog Dogs in. They want to get a gander at your reading and viewing material and they are searching for anything to give probable cause.

Don't play games with these people and don't assume you can outwit them. You just might talk yourself into something you can't get out of. Martha Stewart was locked up not for any wrong doing, but for lying to a federal agent. She talked. Don't be stupid like Martha.

"I have nothing to say!"

I Thought Pigs Were Unkosher?

http://www.realzionistnews.com/?p=494

JEWS BACK KAGAN FOR SUPREME COURT
INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN MACDONALD PhD
By Brother Nathanael Kapner, Copyright 2009


Bulldog dyke n' kike; coming soon to a SCOTUS near you

Brother Nathanael Kapner: What was your initial reaction to Elena Kagan’s candidacy to the Supreme Court?

Kevin MacDonald: The Jewish-owned media initially published a flurry of praises for Kagan’s candidacy. It was obvious to me that the theme of all of this is ethnic networking.

How else explain the fact that someone with a completely undistinguished scholarly record not only got tenure at the University of Chicago but was appointed dean of Harvard Law School?

Br Nathanael: What was the hype on Kagan and what indicated ethnic networking?

Kevin MacDonald: The LA Times first published, “Supreme Court Candidate Elena Kagan Has Admirers Left And Right,” written by David Savage, a Jewish journalist. Although masquerading as news, the article is a brief for the candidacy of Elena Kagan.

Savage notes that Kagan is well connected to top people in the Obama Administration, (Larry Summers being one of them), and there is effusive praise from two legal bigwigs, Laurence Tribe and Charles Fried, both of Harvard and both Jews.

More was to follow from the Huffington Post’s ”Elena Kagan Emerging As Supreme Court Front-Runner.” Once again, the same people were hyping Kagan as absolutely brilliant.

Charles Fried waxed redundant, saying, “Elena Kagan is supremely intelligent, one of the most intelligent people I have known. I think she’s a very, very intelligent person.”

The ethnic networking involved has as its backdrop Kagan being appointed Dean of Harvard Law by Lawrence Summers — also Jewish and with a strong Jewish identity. Summers and Kagan covered for Laurence Tribe when he lifted a passage from another scholar’s book without attribution. Ethnic networking is nothing if not reciprocal.

Br Nathanael: Is there a “Jewish” issue involved if Kagan is nominated?

Kevin MacDonald: The Jewish issue rears its head only slightly according to the HuffPost article: “There has been some superficial concern over Kagan’s religion — not because she’s Jewish but because without Stevens there will be no Protestants on the court.” Also, Kagan would be the first open homosexual on the court.

Br Nathanael: Really? Is Kagan a lesbian?

Kevin MacDonald: The Huffington article certainly suggests it. Also, some have written that Kagan is an “open lesbian.” Others have written that although Kagan is “not out,” she has a female partner. It is said that this is an open secret at Harvard Law School among students and faculty. In any case, Kagan has shown her commitment to gay rights.

Br Nathanael: Getting back to the Jewish issue. Is there a valid concern that if Kagan is nominated there will be no White Protestants on the Supreme Court?

Kevin MacDonald: In a country that in living memory thought of itself as WASP at its very core, it most certainly IS an issue. Without Souter and Stevens gone there will be no Protestants on the court. With Kagan, there will be three Jews and no White Protestants.
Again, in Huffington’s article, when the issue of Kagan’s homosexual orientation is addressed, they wrote, “Strategists predict that this is only a distraction not a speed bump.”

Now, who exactly are these “strategists” and what is the goal of their strategizing?

Br Nathanael: What exactly is the strategy behind the Jewish push for Kagan?

Kevin MacDonald: If Kagan is nominated and confirmed, there would be three Jewish justices on the Supreme Court — all on the left.


Maybe Kagan-thing and Ruth Buzzy Ginsberg can hook up for a little under the black robes box banging?

Jews are of course always overrepresented among elites — especially on the left, but Jews as one-third of the Supreme Court is high by any standard given that they constitute only 2% of the US population. This is much higher than the disproportionate Jewish representation in the US Senate (13%) and the House of Representatives (7%).

Three Jews on the Supreme Court seems sure to raise the eyebrows among people like me who think that Jewish identity often makes a big difference in attitudes and behavior. And if there is one area where mainstream Jewish political identity has had a huge effect, it’s in legislation related to multiculturalism. This is true of the Jewish mainstream across the board, from the far left to the neoconservative right.

Br Nathanael: Where does Kagan stand on multiculturalism? Isn’t she a conservative?

Kevin MacDonald: The amazing thing is that Kagan is being framed as a conservative. But on the issues that really count — issues related to multiculturalism and free speech — Kagan is clearly on the left and touts American Jewry’s position in these areas. Kagan’s record strongly suggests that she would be quite willing to fashion her legal arguments to attain her Jewish goals.

Kagan’s Chicago Law school article, “Regulation of Hate Speech And Pornography” indicates someone who is seeking ways to circumscribe free speech in the interests of multicultural virtue: “We live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality. Certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality. The disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation.”
Br Nathanael: Would Kagan actually rule against the 1st Amendment?”

Kevin MacDonald: In the same article, Kagan wrote that “although the Supreme Court will not in the foreseeable future adopt the view that all governmental efforts to regulate such speech accord with the Constitution, a new majority could rule that all government efforts to regulate such speech would be constitutional.” Need I say more?

Br Nathanael: Do Kagan’s views fit with the outlook of the organized Jewish community?

Kevin MacDonald: The organized Jewish community has a long record of opposing free speech related to multicultural issues. Kagan’s views fit well with the outlook of the organized Jewish community: “Every effort should be made to restrict hate speech within the current legal context and to do whatever possible to change that context so that such speech is outlawed.”

The picture that emerges is that of someone who would have no hesitation to end First Amendment freedoms and squelch any hope that a White racialist movement could achieve real power. Kagan’s vision for America is entirely within the Jewish mainstream.

And if the organized Jewish community has its way with Kagan, Jewish supremacy will reign supreme in America’s Supreme Court.


The joke's on you, Whitey

Neo-cohen hopes kikejews will see that Obongo is not da vey

Norm Podhoretz is a neocon(a "conservative" kikejew or goy ally thereof who cares only about "foreign policy", that is to say, "israel" exclusively) and one of the chief architects of the Iraq war, a misadventure that was to be the first in a series of conflicts to annihilate israel's perceived enemies in the region(Iran, Iraq, Syria). Like all of the jewish neo-cohens, he is a "former" Trotskyite leftist who, finding no traction for their agenda in liberal circles, infiltrated and hijacked the Republican party. I would also add that he, along with Paul Wolfowitz, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, Charles Krautmammer, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser and a host of other criminal heebs should be executed for war crimes.

But a curious thing is happening. The jewish commitment to the Marxist liberalism and the destruction of White Western civilization is beginning to conflict with the well being of the bandit state. Obongo, who is not aware that he has a leash around his ape neck, has not demonstrated a significant amount of concern for izrahell. In fact, he's quite indifferent. I can even detect the slightest hint of hostility towards the subject. A man who actually believes he serves because of the will of the people and is an autonomous executive is a dangerous thing to the puppet masters. It will prove to be even more dangerous for Barry himself, when the Mossad decide that he is no longer useful.

Why do I say this? Since jews are in command of the situation, they care very little who comes out on top in these dog and pony show "elections". They are confident that whoever it is, they will swiftly bring him under their control and enforce compliance. Until now. The war at all costs with Iran that the kikes have been salivating over and anxiously rubbing their hands together in anticipation of, has stalled. Barry will not budge. (I expect a false flag op whereby the Mossad causes an international incident which will be blamed on the Iranians, but this is a topic for another day. )

Podhoretz knows that the prospect of Amerikwa doing the parasite state's dirty work becomes less likely with each passing day. So, here he is, urging his fellow kikejews to do the right thing for israel. Join the republican party. This wont happen. For as much as "Judeo" Christians bow in awe before these devils, jews despise them even more than they do the average goy. In the words of "blue collar" comedian Ron White, "I don't think so, scooter."

While the jews have a tight control on our government, media and institutions, they cannot control everything. Sometimes the events they set in motion conflict and come into diametric opposition, creating unintended consequences, including things that may destroy them along with the intended host. I believe that is the underlying reason for this article.

Why Are Jews Liberals?

"I'm hoping buyer's remorse on Obama will finally cause a kikejew shift to the right."

By NORMAN PODHORETZ

One of the most extraordinary features of Barack Obama's victory over John McCain was his capture of 78% of the Jewish vote. To be sure, there was nothing extraordinary about the number itself. Since 1928, the average Jewish vote for the Democrat in presidential elections has been an amazing 75%—far higher than that of any other ethno-religious group. (and yet some still fail to make the connection between these subversive nation wreckers and all of the filth we are neck deep in.)

Yet there were reasons to think that it would be different in 2008. The main one was Israel. Despite some slippage in concern for Israel among American Jews, most of them were still telling pollsters that their votes would be strongly influenced by the positions of the two candidates on the Jewish state. This being the case, Mr. McCain's long history of sympathy with Israel should have given him a distinct advantage over Mr. Obama, whose own history consisted of associating with outright enemies of the Jewish state like the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and the historian Rashid Khalidi.(This lays bare the outright hatred they have for White Western civilization and Christianity. It's also called "cutting off your nose to spite your face.")

Heebs for Obongo. Podhoretz says dis vas not da vey.

Nevertheless, Mr. Obama beat Mr. McCain among Jewish voters by a staggering 57 points. Except for African Americans, who gave him 95% of their vote, Mr. Obama did far better with Jews than with any other ethnic or religious group. Thus the Jewish vote for him was 25 points higher than the 53% he scored with the electorate as a whole; 35 points higher than the 43% he scored with whites; 11 points higher than the 67% he scored with Hispanics; 33 points higher than the 45% he scored with Protestants; and 24 points higher than the 54% he scored with Catholics.

These numbers remind us of the extent to which the continued Jewish commitment to the Democratic Party has become an anomaly. All the other ethno-religious groups that, like the Jews, formed part of the coalition forged by Franklin Delano Roosevelt(crypto jew) in the 1930s have followed the rule that increasing prosperity generally leads to an increasing identification with the Republican Party. But not the Jews. As the late Jewish scholar Milton Himmelfarb said in the 1950s: "Jews earn like Episcopalians"—then the most prosperous minority group in America—"and vote like Puerto Ricans," who were then the poorest.

Jews also remain far more heavily committed to the liberal agenda than any of their old ethno-religious New Deal partners. As the eminent sociologist Nathan Glazer has put it, "whatever the promptings of their economic interests," Jews have consistently supported "increased government spending, expanded benefits to the poor and lower classes, greater regulations on business, and the power of organized labor."(and illegal third world immigration, "civil rights", fomentation of anti-White and anti-Christian sentiment, destruction of the nuclear family, normalization of homosexuality and pedophilia, pornography, miscegenation, abortion, and nearly every other vile thing leads a slug trail back to the jew.)

As with these old political and economic questions, so with the newer issues being fought out in the culture wars today. On abortion, gay rights, school prayer, gun control and assisted suicide, the survey data show that Jews are by far the most liberal of any group in America.(This is called "stating the obvious.")

Most American Jews sincerely believe that their liberalism, together with their commitment to the Democratic Party as its main political vehicle, stems from the teachings of Judaism and reflects the heritage of "Jewish values."(more like "Talmudic values") But if this theory were valid, the Orthodox would be the most liberal sector of the Jewish community. After all, it is they who are most familiar with the Jewish religious tradition and who shape their lives around its commandments.(Which merely substantiates the point that their subversive nature has little to do with their "religion".)

Yet the Orthodox enclaves are the only Jewish neighborhoods where Republican candidates get any votes to speak of. Even more telling is that on every single cultural issue, the Orthodox oppose the politically correct liberal positions taken by most other American Jews precisely because these positions conflict with Jewish law. To cite just a few examples: Jewish law permits abortion only to protect the life of the mother; it forbids sex between men; and it prohibits suicide (except when the only alternatives are forced conversion or incest).(C'mon, Norm. It's not that hard to figure out. The kikejew is "a people apart." It's perfectly fine for the goyim to defile themselves, it's even a kike's duty to encourage it while at the same time profitting from it.)

The upshot is that in virtually every instance of a clash between Jewish law and contemporary liberalism, it is the liberal creed that prevails for most American Jews. Which is to say that for them, liberalism has become more than a political outlook. It has for all practical purposes superseded Judaism and become a religion in its own right.(these Kazar devils are not the least bit "religious". Judaism exists solely to prop up their "self chosen" claim.) And to the dogmas and commandments of this religion they give the kind of steadfast devotion their forefathers gave to the religion of the Hebrew Bible. For many, moving to the right is invested with much the same horror their forefathers felt about conversion to Christianity.

All this applies most fully to Jews who are Jewish only in an ethnic sense. Indeed, many such secular Jews, when asked how they would define "a good Jew," reply that it is equivalent to being a good liberal.(I define a "good jew" as one who is dead, or boarding a plane for Tel-Aviv with one way ticket in hand.)

But avowed secularists are not the only Jews who confuse Judaism with liberalism; so do many non-Orthodox Jews who practice this or that traditional observance. It is not for nothing that a cruel wag has described the Reform movement—the largest of the religious denominations within the American Jewish community—as "the Democratic Party with holidays thrown in," and the services in a Reform temple as "the Democratic Party at prayer."

As a Jew who moved from left to right more than four decades ago, I have been hoping for many years that my fellow Jews would come to see that in contrast to what was the case in the past, our true friends are now located not among liberals, but among conservatives.(This is what Commander Rockwell referred to as "friends of the Captain, friends of the Crew")

Of course in speaking of the difference between left and right, or between liberals and conservatives, I have in mind a divide wider than the conflict between Democrats and Republicans and deeper than electoral politics. The great issue between the two political communities is how they feel about the nature of American society. With all exceptions duly noted, I think it fair to say that what liberals mainly see when they look at this country is injustice and oppression of every kind—economic, social and political. By sharp contrast, conservatives see a nation shaped by a complex of traditions, principles and institutions that has afforded more freedom and, even factoring in periodic economic downturns, more prosperity to more of its citizens than in any society in human history. It follows that what liberals believe needs to be changed or discarded—and apologized for to other nations—is precisely what conservatives are dedicated to preserving, reinvigorating and proudly defending against attack.

In this realm, too, American Jewry surely belongs with the conservatives rather than the liberals. For the social, political and moral system that liberals wish to transform is the very system in and through which Jews found a home such as they had never discovered in all their forced wanderings throughout the centuries over the face of the earth.(Is Norm basically saying that Amerikwa is the ultimate parasite haven?)

The Jewish immigrants who began coming here from Eastern Europe in the 1880s were right to call America "the golden land." They soon learned that there was no gold in the streets, as some of them may have imagined, which meant that they had to struggle, and struggle hard. But there was another, more precious kind of gold in America. There was freedom and there was opportunity. Blessed with these conditions, we children and grandchildren and great-grandchildren of these immigrants flourished—and not just in material terms—to an extent unmatched in the history of our people.(Expecting a people with subversion and nation wrecking in their very DNA to adopt a different way is like trying to get a lion to lose his taste for zebra meat.)

What I am saying is that if anything bears eloquent testimony to the infinitely precious virtues of the traditional American system, it is the Jewish experience in this country. Surely, then, we Jews ought to be joining with its defenders against those who are blind or indifferent or antagonistic to the philosophical principles, the moral values, and the socioeconomic institutions on whose health and vitality the traditional American system depends.(Kind of hard to do, Norm, when you are operating under the over riding command to topple the crown jewel of Western civilization.)

In 2008, we were faced with a candidate who ran to an unprecedented degree on the premise that the American system was seriously flawed and in desperate need of radical change—not to mention a record powerfully indicating that he would pursue policies dangerous to the security of Israel. Because of all this, I hoped that my fellow Jews would finally break free of the liberalism to which they have remained in thrall long past the point where it has served either their interests or their ideals.(Norm, you're killing me here. I'll have to wipe away the tears of laughter before proceeding.)

That possibility having been resoundingly dashed, I now grasp for some encouragement from the signs that buyer's remorse is beginning to set in among Jews, as it also seems to be doing among independents. Which is why I am hoping against hope that the exposure of Mr. Obama as a false messiah will at last open the eyes of my fellow Jews to the correlative falsity of the political creed he so perfectly personifies and to which they have for so long been so misguidedly loyal. (the leopard does not change his spots...)

"I'm looking forward to Armageddon..."

I didn't think there was anything more repulsive than a jew, but I may have found something that comes pretty close: "Christian" Zionists. This pretty much sums up why the Republican't party is a viper's nest of anti-White shabbas goy toadies, and therefore of no use to the White Nationalist.  That goes without saying for most of you. I instead aim that sentiment at any fence sitter who may wander in here who still has faith in the political process and believes that there is a difference in the Zionist controlled two party system.

The Tightening Tendrils of Jewish Supremacism

Mossad front group ADL to partner with Youtube to crush free speech

NEW YORK, Dec. 11 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- YouTube has reached out to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) for its expertise in dealing with hate on the Internet. In one outgrowth of that partnership, the League is now a contributor to YouTube's newly launched Abuse & Safety Center, where users are empowered to identify and confront hate, and to report abuses.

The YouTube Abuse & Safety Center features information and links to resources developed by ADL to help Internet users respond to and report offensive material and extremist content that violates YouTube's Community Guidelines on hate speech. "YouTube is an incredible tool for sharing videos and giving individuals an opportunity to broadcast themselves, but like other social networking sites it can be abused or used for sinister and dangerous purposes," said Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director.

"There are those who may try to exploit the technology to spread racism, anti-Semitism and other forms of hate." "We commend YouTube for their efforts to provide users with access to important information from those with expertise, such as ADL and others, on how to effectively respond to hate on the Internet and to report abuses," said Mr. Foxman. "Obviously, the industry has a vested interest in providing a safe online experience for the community of users, but they cannot go it alone. Maintaining a prejudice-free zone on the Internet means constant vigilance on the part of everyone. Parents, educators, industry, government and nonprofit watchdogs must work together. The bigots can only be sidelined if people of good will are actively reporting abuses, so that the Internet service providers can take action."

Since the advent of the Internet, ADL has played a leading role in working to combat hate on the Internet through education and advocacy. The League monitors extremism and hate on the Internet and works with major service providers, including Google, to identify and respond to offensive content. Last year, the League launched a major initiative to counteract cyberbullying by providing access to educational resources and information to parents, teachers, students and caregivers.

ADL also serves as the U.S. representative to the International Network Against Cyber-Hate (INACH). More information is available on the League's web site at www.adl.org/Internet. The YouTube Abuse & Safety Center was unveiled on December 11 at the annual conference of the Family Online Safety Institute in Washington D.C. and can be found at http://help.youtube.com/support/youtube/bin/request.py?contact_type=abuse. A link to the Center is also available at the bottom of every YouTube page. The Anti-Defamation League, founded in 1913, is the world's leading organization fighting anti-Semitism through programs and services that counteract hatred, prejudice and bigotry.

SOURCE Anti-Defamation League

http://www.ibtimes.com/prnews/20081211/youtube-adl-safety.htm

Reichsmarshal says: "Most of us have been calling this enterprise "jewtube" for a few years now. Can there be any doubt now? You know what to do, kids. Upload all of your anti-zionist, holohoax, and racialist videos to http://www.podblanc.com/. Get all the information, PDFs, articles, etc. that you can from White Nationalist sites and download it all to your hard drive to make sure none of it gets flushed down the Memory Hole."