This commercial is a ridiculous parody. Yet, in its outlandishness, it points to a disturbing trend among White "men", who waste copious amounts of time sitting on their duffs and living vicariously through a pack of subhuman nigger savages gamboling about like over excited monkeys, flinging projectiles that for all intents and purposes may as well be feces.
We have been exposed to countless commercials, television shows and movies that hammer home to White women that nigger bucks are desirable. Here then, is a new twist on the old perversion: the emasculated, feminized male placed in an overtly homo erotic situation, with the added entendre of negro worship. Jewthink carried to its next logical conclusion.
Most whigger zombies of course will simply laugh at what they will dismiss as a "cute" or "funny" commercial, while their operant conditioning to hate themselves becomes reinforced with yet another blow to the collective White psyche.
i'm sounding a warning abt "incogman"....looks like he's "moderating"/censoring all the comments on his 'blog now....i think that cunt is some sort of crypto-kike!....i just posted some-thing on there abt Brendon O'Connell....lots of local Down Under info'...especially with respect to Australian gun laws and the fucking maggot khyboshed it!
ReplyDeletehe's either a kike or an under-cover "fed" or some similar scumbag!
I personally have no problem with Incog and respect and admire all that he's done and continues to do. On the other hand, I don't comment at his blog, so I don't know how dictatorial he might be in moderating his site.
ReplyDeleteDid you make reference to or advocate violence? He's touchy about that given what happened to his original word press blog.
It's his blog and he calls the shots. I don't know why he allows some of the obvious trolls on there to continue disrupting his board.
What is your take on Brendon O'Connell?
Did you make reference to or advocate violence? He's touchy about that given what happened to his original word press blog
ReplyDeletemaybe he's too fckn "touchy", eh?
his definition of "advocating violence" is pretty fucking "elastic"!
wtf should he care, any-way?
no-one knows who the cunt is or can even contact him!
he can "back up" his 'blog and have it "up and running" again in less than a day if "WordPress" khyboshes him!
any-way...it was my under-standing that the First Amendment covered pretty much all 'speech' except if you're advocating violence against specific people (a la Bill White and a la Hal Turner);
i can't recall ever having done so on his 'blog!
stuff on Brendan O'Connell..... here;
(you have to "register" to access the Forum!)
@Jimbo
ReplyDelete"i think that cunt is some sort of crypto-kike!.."
I think you're on the money. The tosser bans me all the time, but on the quiet, no warning, no mention. Just can't access it.
I've defended the prick in the past. No more.
His "letter to my brothers" ends in shalom!
Who the hell that isn't a kike says that?
I for one always enjoyed your comments there. I also feel your solution is the only viable way in the final analysis.
Good luck to you.
Cannibal Rabbi
"The tosser bans me all the time..."
ReplyDeleteMaybe it's because you're an asshole...? A shit disturbing vulgar jew?