Friday, August 6, 2010

Suspicions Confirmed

Anyone following this blog knows that I've been wary of this "Tea Party" movement from day one and have held it as suspect. Whatever legitimacy it may have had as a genuine grass roots movement has been poisoned by what plagues all above ground movements: co-option by kikejew infiltrators(or their shabbas goy puppets).

Meet the new bosses, same as the old bosses:

Psychotic kike loving bitch and icon of the Tea Party, Michele Bachmann

Now that the congressional supporters of the Tea Party movement have formed their own caucus, their policy positions are becoming easier to track. Expanding their foray into foreign policy, 21 members of the new caucus have now come out explicitly endorsing Israel's right to strike Iran's nuclear program.

Almost two dozen Tea Party-affiliated lawmakers cosponsored a new resolution late last week that expresses their support for Israel "to use all means necessary to confront and eliminate nuclear threats posed by the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the use of military force."

The lead sponsor of the resolution was Texas Republican Louie Gohmert, one of four congressmen to announce the formation of the 44-member Tea Party caucus at a press conference on July 21. The other three Tea Party Caucus leaders, Michele Bachmann, R-MN, Steve King, R-IA, and John Culberson, R-TX, are also sponsors of the resolution. In total, 21 Tea Party Caucus members have signed on, according to the latest list of caucus members put out by Bachmann's office.

The resolution cites threats by Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to "annihilate" the state of Israel, endorses other means to persuade Iran to stop pursuing nuclear weapons, and states the lawmakers' support for an Israeli military strike "if no other peaceful solution can be found within reasonable time."

"Members of the Tea Party caucus can and do speak for themselves," said Gohmert in an emailed statement, "but most if not all members have strong beliefs that we should not turn on our backs on our best friends and reward those bent on our destruction. This resolution was borne out of concern for the threat, not merely to Israel, but also to the United States."

Notably absent from the resolution -- and indeed, from the Tea Party Caucus -- is Ron Paul, the Texas congressman and 2008 presidential candidate. Paul, who leads the libertarian wing of the Tea Party movement, was one of only 11 members of the House to vote against the recent Iran sanctions bill, which he called "very, very dangerous and not well thought out"; in 2007 he expressed his concern that "a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran."

There's little chance the resolution, which has 46 co-sponsors in total, will see a vote on the House floor any time soon. But the resolution signals increasing interest by the Tea Party and its congressional supporters in foreign policy.

Last week, a Tea Party-affiliated grassroots organization launched a nationwide campaign to build popular opposition to the administration's nuclear reductions treaty with Russia, called New START. The group is led by Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas's wife Ginny[race traitor mud shark] and it dovetails with similar efforts by former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney.

The resolution also continues a theme among Tea Party leaders, such as Sarah Palin, who are seeking to separate the movement's domestic policies, which call for small government and fiscal restraint, from libertarian views on foreign policy, promoting instead an aggressive, unilateralist view of world affairs and unchecked military spending.[That's fancy talk for absolute fealty to Israel]


So there it is. No grand "White Awakening" as many foolishly believed, just a reordering and round up of those who've left the GOP reservation, and the inevitable morphing back into the republicunt party from whence it came. The fix is in. Israel Uber Alles.

Any salvation forthcoming will not come in the form of a "vote the bums out" shell game, but from insurgency. Blood alone moves the wheels of history. Pick your targets well.


  1. I agree with ya alright. It never ceases to amaze me that alot folks still think that the economy is going to perk up, the war is justified, that jews are 'special' and above common law, the list is endless as you know.

  2. the aggression against Iran is racial...pure & simple!

    probably up to ½ of the Iranian ppltn could be clearly identified as "Aryan";

    that may sound strange to those who get their info' from the jew media...even "WNs"!

    but: !Google "Iranian children" on pix sites like "flickr" &c!

    race is the KEY to history!

    race is EVERY-THING!

    *any political group that doesn't "call out the kike" are, usually, in bed with the filth!*

  3. I knew as soon as the Fox News Channel started touting how great they were it was a lost cause. Whether it was started with grand intentions or not it has been corrupted just like all the others, in the meaning of giving us diversity in our parties even though under the surface the same cesspool exists.

    This is just further proof that there can be no chance at redemption by working within the system. All these new parties are controlled by the same special interests that control the old parties. Only a fool would be duped by this whole scheme of change. They preach change all the time and I have yet to see any change, that is for the better anyways.

  4. The majority of the people of Iran have become a mudrace, Jim. The Persians of the days of old have been infused with the blood of Mongolian and Arab invaders for some time now. The war isn't "anti-white" from the jew point of view, it is only a war against yet another of their enemies. They have no intention of fighting this theological enemy themselves. They would much rather we do it for them. I hope we refuse their demands.

    Your typical Khazar/Ashkenazi jew has more shared blood with a typical Iranian of today than you do.

  5. Maybe so, Dave, but I find it real interesting that Glenn Beck repeats constantly how Iran means "Aryan" and therefore "Nazi-like" and how cozy Hitler was with Persians and muslims, as he bangs the war drums for his kike over lords. They may not be ginning up a war on an actual White nation, but certainly upon a White ideal upon which it may have once stood...with nary an eye bat from the drones.

  6. As always you make great points, RM. There is a contradiction between our own race's survival and the racist kikejew agenda. As Jim correctly pointed out these jews are racist.

    Just don't allow these filthy kikejews to define what Aryan or any other word means for that matter. They are a perversion upon anything they undertake.

    Long live the Iranians! Perhaps if any real Aryans are left when the shit hits the fan we can teach them a thing or two by example.

  7. i maintain that my estimate of up to ½ of the Iranian ppltn being "white" is reasonable, pending wide-spread DNA-testing of that ppltn;

    failing that, the only other way to know for sure would be to conduct an "anthropological photo-expedition" there, visiting as many populated areas of the country as possible;

    until then, it would seem reasonable to maintain that photos like "the Iranian children" collection @ certainly lend weight to the assertion that, at the very least, a goodly % of the Iranian population could be classified as "white"!

  8. HAHAHA!

    "History Channel Nazi's" lead the way!!!

    Perhaps, I should start a movement to motivate the "white" mestizos to fight against the degradation of my race. Perhaps these mestizos will also contribute to the future renaissance after we rid the world of it's degenerate nature.

    Read up!


    No filthy kikejew will ever define what I am. Nor will any meth addict.